1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

KJVO Sect's Hatred of LXX

Discussion in '2003 Archive' started by Dr. Bob, Jul 31, 2003.

  1. Anti-Alexandrian

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    764
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whats the matter? They wont soothe that itch for ya?(2Tim 4:3)Or maybe,its:Galatians 4:16?
     
  2. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    Askjo said:

    Get a book, "Forever Settled" by Jack Moorman

    And what academic qualifications make Moorman more qualified to weigh in on the issue than, say, Kurt Aland or Bruce Metzger?
     
  3. Forever settled in heaven

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    y izzit that KJBOs always balk at completing the phrase "Forever settled ___ _________"?

    one of their top 10 phobias, perhaps, to realize that GOd ALSO preserved His Word--more perfectly than the ones they hold--in **Heaven.** [​IMG]
     
  4. Anti-Alexandrian

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    764
    Likes Received:
    0
    Academics has nothing to do with it;its about being a Bible believer(KJB).
     
  5. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,285
    Likes Received:
    507
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Are you telling me that academic honesty in this study is not necessary? Circle one: Yes No

    Or that I am not a Bible believer because I believe the Bible is in the Greek/Hebrew and in every accurate translation into every language? Circle one: Yes No
     
  6. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, This website is "a Survey of the Documents AND History of the Bible." This history of the Bible tells you and proves its evidences of the Bible.
     
  7. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Correct and yes, absolutely! [​IMG] :D
     
  8. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Metzger, an unbeliever? Or Moorman, a believer?

    Why did you violate with the Scripture, 2 Corinthians 6:14?

    "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?"
     
  9. mioque

    mioque New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    Only one problem, with "Forever Settled" by Jack Moorman, we have got the physical evidence of the LXX existing over a century before the birth of Christ.
    Should I post the pictures again? [​IMG]
     
  10. Forever settled in heaven

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    Metzger, an unbeliever? Or Moorman, a believer?

    Why did you violate with the Scripture, 2 Corinthians 6:14?

    "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?"
    </font>[/QUOTE]but nobody was accusing Moorman of being an unbeliever.

    he may be academically dishonest w the evidence, for whatever motives, but his salvation wasn't impugned. :rolleyes:
     
  11. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    Askjo said:

    Metzger, an unbeliever? Or Moorman, a believer?

    First, I didn't ask what their spiritual state was, but their academic qualifications. Bruce Metzger has spent an entire lifetime studying this issue, and has earned the right to be given more consideration than Moorman, who has not.

    Second, I have seen no evidence that Bruce Metzger is an "unbeliever," except of the he-doesn't-toe-our-party-line variety.
     
  12. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Please don't confuse anyone with evidence.

    HankD
     
  13. AV Defender

    AV Defender New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Those fragments do not a LXX make.


    1)That is not a Greek Old Testament.

    2)That is not Isaiah,Hosea,or Psalms.

    3)No New Testament writer quoted one verse in any of those Papyri.
     
  14. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,285
    Likes Received:
    507
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Which papyri? The ones that do not exist? This denial of truth and attempt to rewrite history is more than a little annoying to us. :eek:

    Again I ask, WHY is admitting that there were Greek translations of the OT in existence at the time of Christ and over 100 quotations from said Greek (NOT Hebrew) in the NT so much of an issue to the "only" sect?

    Thanks
     
  15. mioque

    mioque New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    0
  16. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did Bruce tell the whole truth on textual criticism? I do not think so. Bruce and W/H agreed each other concerning their textual criticism on manuscript evidences, however W/H admitted the fact, which I know, that supported the Traditional family. Bruce covered up because he refused to admit honestly. Interestingly, they contradicted each other on manuscript evidences.

    It is your denial. You need to look at the website here: Metzger
     
  17. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    Askjo said:

    Did Bruce tell the whole truth on textual criticism? I do not think so.

    That's nice, but I am more interested in the evidence than the contents of your skull. I have seen a lot of the latter, and so far none of the former.

    It is your denial. You need to look at the website here:

    Cloud piles up multiple quotes of Metzger saying "Some scholars believe," and then arbitrarily assigns all such beliefs to Metzger himself without a single justification for doing so. That proves nothing, except what we already knew: David Cloud is often grossly dishonest.
     
  18. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who are "some scholars"?
     
  19. Forever settled in heaven

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    talk abt going off topic. anyway, the issue of scholars' orthodoxy is irrelevant as KJBOs have been unable to show--despite the Liberalism of some textual critics--how their doctrinal beliefs affected their textual choices in the least. nor have they shown how the KJB's Anglican scholars twisted the text they were using just becos they were a buncha genuflecting Anglicans. if anything, they made the exact SAME textual choices over 90% of the time!

    but back to the topic, what abt the LXX? why duck the evidence?
     
  20. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    Askjo said:

    Who are "some scholars"?

    Hey, it's your argument. You tell us.
     
Loading...