Featured LIVE COVERAGE OF LIBERAL AUTHORITARIAN DEMOCRAT DEBATE

Now that the first debate is over, I bet Biden announces within the week.

 

I don't really think so. I think if Hillary had kinda tanked, it would have given him an opening to jump in the race. But she did really well and probably closed the door to Biden jumping in at this point. He might make it interesting, but Hillary will still be the Dem nominee because they want to win come next November and she is really the only one on the Dem side who can just about guarantee a victory.

Not to mention that it would look really indecisive and unsure for him to jump in AFTER the first debate. If he wanted to be President, folks would have expected a commitment before these debates started.For that reason, I think he's not gonna jump in. But we'll see.

 

I did not watch but maybe 30 minutes, but what I saw was a very obvious "Non-aggression" pact amongst the dims, and particularly against Hill!
Oh, and a stampede to see who could play the role of "Santa Claus" better!

 

The questions started out tough, but got easy as the night wore on. Everytime I saw CNN's Dana Bash I thought of Jar Jar Binks.

 

I watched very little of the debate It turned out like I expected, The Miss Piggy Show.

 

Yeah, I just saw bits and pieces of it and the ratings were less than stellar but there were no really breakout moments for any of them IMO. I thought this exchange was the roughest part:

and she handled it very well to me. About Biden, he IS making noise that he will jump in and will probably decide within a week:

http://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-decision-on-running-for-president-vulernabilities-2015-10

 

[QUOTE="Zaac, post: 2177016, member: 11453"
Chaffee? Who cares?[/QUOTE]


Chaffee looks like Thing One and Thing Two from the Cat in the Hat cartoons.

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk

 

Ventriloquist's dummy.

 

You may be right. Three weeks maximum.

 

If you compare the line up of Democrat candidates to the line up of Republican candidates one can truly see which party is diverse and which one looks highly racist.

 

I said what I'm about to say again months ago. The GOP is reactionary. They are pushing Ben Carson because they want the world to think (1) that the party isn't filled with racists; and (2) that the Democrats chose a black man who didn't know what he was doing, but they, the all-knowing Republicans could choose "the right kind" of black man. Kinda as a one-up to what the Democrats did.

Only problem is that the country has moved on from the fascination and progressiveness of having a black President and have moved on to having the first female President. And these are the kind of things that the GOP just cannot seem to grasp.

We're in an age where being the first to do something has a certain appeal to folks even if they don't closely follow politics. Politics has become more marketing than substance.

Now had the GOP run a black nominee in 2012, things might be a little bit different today. But it's OBVIOUS what they are trying to do now. And they remain behind the learning curve.

Now if the GOP had been pushing someone who more readily represented a Hispanic background, then I'd say "Play ball" with the 2016 election.

As it stands, this will be over as soon as Hillary gets the Democrat nomination.

 

The GOP isn't really pushing anyone, yet. I still say Rubio is the only Republican that can beat Hillary. He's been slowly inching up in the polls.