Lobbyists pushed off advisory panels

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Crabtownboy, Nov 27, 2009.

  1. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,659
    Likes Received:
    158
    Good for Obama! Lobbyists have had too much power and it needs to be trimmed.

     
  2. preachinjesus

    preachinjesus
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,406
    Likes Received:
    99
    Lobbyists are standing in the way of progress for all parties concerned.

    This needed to be done sooner. Honestly, the sad thing is that this is going to be a constant battle. Vigilance is essential.

    If we had a body that could help with oversight over these things we could realistically reduce the federal regulators and regulatory agencies. That would be a great thing imho. :)
     
  3. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,949
    Likes Received:
    299
    Rank hypocrisy from a president who kisses the feet of labor unions, trial lawyers, and the abortion lobby.
     
    #3 carpro, Nov 27, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 27, 2009
  4. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    Whether this is good or bad remains to be seen.

    Will the vacancies now be filled by ACORN members?
     
  5. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,505
    Likes Received:
    40
    If this is legit, why is it not being promoted loud and long???

    Hate to be skeptical, (well, not really) but based on past performance, I'm leery of ANYTHING this admin does; no matter how "good" it appears!

    I see this relative secrecy as a covert way to get some other arrangement in place that would probably not be too well received by the public -- if they knew!!
     
  6. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,386
    Likes Received:
    790
    Tadaaaa!........
     
  7. Robert Snow

    Robert Snow
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    4,466
    Likes Received:
    0
    If we could get rid of lobbyist it might be a good start, but I don't think that is the crux of the problem. The problem, as I see it, it the politicians themselves. Just because someone is offered a bribe or shown how they will benefit personally if they favor a particular piece of legislation, doesn't mean they should sell out.

    I fear if we did not have lobbyist, then the politicians would go door to door looking for them.

    What we need is a new kind of politician who is a statesman rather than a charlatan. In this day in America, I doubt we find very many of them.
     
  8. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Until the time comes that legislators are required to personally read the legislation they vote on, lobbyists perform a useful function. Many legislators have people in the private sector whom they trust about specific technical matters. Even if this person was (only) a fellow church member, he would be classified as a lobbyist unless he was on the legislator's staff.
     

Share This Page

Loading...