Man Fired for Refusing to Wear 666 Sticker

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by JTornado1, Nov 18, 2011.

  1. JTornado1

    JTornado1
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good! It is just a number between 665 & 667. What an idiot.
     
  3. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's "good" to you that someone was fired for not wearing a stupid sticker that has nothing to do with his job or his job performance?
     
  4. preacher4truth

    preacher4truth
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,121
    Likes Received:
    0
    ...and then he ends it with a derogatory name, i.e. "idiot?" I'm certain somehow he'll find it justifiable for a Christian to behave this way.
     
    #4 preacher4truth, Nov 18, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 18, 2011
  5. Alcott

    Alcott
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    7,454
    Likes Received:
    93
    And what is a piece of thin rubber? Yet...http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2000/feb/00020803 a Hasidic Jew was fired for refusing to sell condoms, claiming his religious rights were infringed. Is he an idiot also IYO? Then how about the many retail and other employees who refuse to work on the sabbath? The hospital staffers who will not assist with abortions? The native American in south Texas who refused to cut his hair as his law enforcement job required?
     
  6. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    Job performance includes subordination. Its not like the employer asked him to wear an antichrist sticker, it was a safety achievement.
     
  7. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
  8. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    The loss of his job in this case.
    If he took the job knowing he would have to, yes.
    See above (and the sabbath is not sunday)
    Why did they take a job there, and if their views have since changed, why haven't they quit? Yes
    See second response
     
    #8 webdog, Nov 18, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 18, 2011
  9. Robert Snow

    Robert Snow
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    4,466
    Likes Received:
    0
    The guy should have tripped on his way to the meeting. This would have been a workplace injury. He could then start the next day wearing the number one.
     
  10. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would you have the same attitude your employer required you to wear a satanic costume at your job? As a reminder that "the devil is in the details".

    There is a matter of the accomodation of the faith of the employees.

    If this man felt that it was a violation of his religious beliefs to wear 666 then the employer had an obligation to make a reasonable accomodation.

    Not wearing the 666 sticker did not have an adverse impact on the employer.
     
  11. preacher4truth

    preacher4truth
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,121
    Likes Received:
    0
    :thumbsup:
     
  12. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
    Targus, so are you for capitalism and less regulation and restrictions on business only when it suits you? Employers should be able to require whatever they want out of employees. Employees are then free to choose to work there or not.
     
  13. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
    :laugh: :thumbsup:
     
  14. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    What's the complaint? Insufficient government regulations? <G>

    That's what happens when one works a scab job with no labor contract. You all want to have your cake and eat it. In the real world, you pays your money and makes your choice. You want to work a scab job? Either the boss or the government is king. How can it be otherwise?
     
  15. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,240
    Likes Received:
    2
    What if he went to burger king, and his bill was $6.66 ?

    This is silly. I don't know if he should have been fired, but if you READ the bible, instead of throwing it around to try and trip up people, you would know the # of the beast is not anything, if it isn't on the right hand, or the forehead.
     
  16. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,240
    Likes Received:
    2

    Oh brother. This is a silly as the O/P.
     
  17. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    non sequitur...and silly. The devil is behind 666 days of no accidents?!?

    has nothing to do with accomodation and faith. Its this kind of thing that gives christianity a bad name and makes is look foolish.

    not even close. There is no violation of religious beliefs in wearing a sticker celebrating 666 days of being accident free. Was it used as shock marketing? Possibly, but still acceptable.
    insubordination always has an adverse affect on the employer. This is not an accomodation issue, but an ignorance issue (as we can see by the sabbath comment in this thread). Would this employee also have an issue with wearing a 777 day accident free sticker? I'm guessing not, but the legalist in me would be outraged that someone could dare wear the number reserved for our Lord alone! You see how silly this can get? This employee's next job should be pharissee.
     
    #17 webdog, Nov 19, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 19, 2011
  18. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,087
    Likes Received:
    218
    Did they all wear a badge the next day with then number 667?

    if so, not an issue
     
  19. Havensdad

    Havensdad
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,382
    Likes Received:
    0
    No one with an "Occupy Wall Street" avatar, has any business calling someone an idiot.
     
  20. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    :laugh::laugh::laugh:
     

Share This Page

Loading...