While reading another thread, I noticed a person said that modern Bibles have a better manuscript choice than the KJV. I have no doubt about that because the TR is not exactly the best choice of the Byzantine texts, nor is the Vulgate (when used). However, I would like some discussion from people who prefer the CT to the MT and some scientific reasons why it is better. Do NOT turn this into a KJVo debate. That is NOT the intention, so if you wish to make unwarranted statements on how the MT is better, then start your own thread. I would like to hear from both sides, but let us stick to WHY we believe the documents are superior and what proof is available. Have at it.