Acts 1:12-26 recounts the selection of Matthias as a replacement for Judas Iscariot. I've read some commentators who state that this action was quite presumptuous---and that God did not recognize it as valid, mainly because the Jerusalem believers had not yet been fully endowed with the HS. Most of these commentators state that God intended Paul to be that replacement. OTOH, I've also read that some commentators contend that this action was a valid one. Some of these commentators point to the "binding / loosing" clause in Matthew 16:19 as relevant in this particular case. SO.....what do you think about this selection of Matthias?