1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

My Views, Your Vote

Discussion in '2000-02 Archive' started by Michael Wrenn, Nov 5, 2001.

  1. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joshua and Russell,

    Thank you so very much. It seems as if some "Baptists" here have forgotten what the Baptist distinctives are. So, you think my views make me a Baptist more so than a Methodist or Episcopalian, or Quaker?

    Josh,

    Prayers for the dead--not like the Mormons or purgatory-believing Catholics, but like the Episcopalians in their "Prayers of the People" section of the Book of Common Prayer. I think I'll post some of them when I get home.

    Josh, I think you may have me pegged--a moderate or conservative, semi-liturgical, non-Calvinist Baptist. [​IMG]

    Russell,

    Thanks for the words of welcome.
     
  2. Rev. Joshua

    Rev. Joshua <img src=/cjv.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    2,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    Michael, there are certainly Quaker congregations where you would probably fit in fine. The Book of Discipline would probably give you fits if you were a Methodist, as would the episcopal hierarchy and canon law if you were an Episcopalian. I'd say baptist remains the best fit.

    No need to quote those prayer book prayers here on my account. We plan worship at Virginia-Highland Baptist out of the Book of Common Prayer.

    Joshua
     
  3. Brian

    Brian New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2001
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Michael why aren't we once saved always saved? When Jesus explained it to Nicodemus He reffered to being born again and being born of water and of Spirit. We can die be killed and even completly evaporated but not unborn. So like our bodies being born and can't be unborn after that neither can our soul be 'unborn' once it is saved.

    Brian
     
  4. Brian

    Brian New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2001
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry forgot to vote. Not Baptist. And like yourself I don't know what to call what you believe. Hopefully without angering you part af what Chris said appears to be true you make sweeping denoucements of people and thier posts when they don't agree with you. Like we are all defective because we're fundamental or real conservitave. Yet by your own admission your beliefs don't fall into any biblicly supported denomination. My sense of you through your posts is that it is indeed more about what you choose to believe than anything else. Again I really don't want to make you mad but you need to get right. I don't mean get right in the sense of agreeing with me I mean in the sense of not leaning to your own understanding but relying on the Holy Spirit to reveal it to you. Which by the way is another reason we can't loose salvation. Once the Holy Spirit indwells us He stays in us.
    Which leads to a question do you believe that you can be demon possesed after salvation?
    I'll shutup now.

    Brian
     
  5. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Brian,

    I'll just say a few things: First, you are wrong in your opinion of me. Second, spiritual birth cannot be compared to physical birth. Third, I think a Christian can be demon-oppressed but not demon-possessed.

    Oh, BTW, I don't denounce people because they disagree with me; that's a militant fundamentalist characteristic. I don't have a problem with disagreement; anyone can see that if they truly read my dialogue with some here--with Jeff Weaver, for one. No, I have a problem with the MANNER in which people disagree with me--that is, arrogantly, patronizingly, insultingly.

    You presume things about me that you do not know and then proceed to make false judgments about me based on those false presumptions--which several here have done. Let me tell you this: I have come to my present beliefs through searching and examining and under the guidance of the Holy Spirit; my views have changed over the years, not because I decided that I would believe a certain way but because God led me to change my beliefs--I HAVE relied on the Holy Spirit to reveal truth to me; that's why nothing that you, Chris Temple, or anyone else here may say will ever deter me from following the Holy Spirit's leading--because God gave me my beliefs and not man, and I am not subject to any man's interpretation. God alone is Lord of my conscience. And that, sir, is BAPTIST!

    BTW, I didn't say that my beliefs didn't fall into any biblically supported denomination; I said that they didn't ALL fall into any ONE denomination.

    Some of my best friends are fundamentalists; but they're not hateful, mean-spirited, arrogant know-it-alls.
     
  6. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Josh,

    In what way do you think the United Methodist Book of Discipline would give me fits?

    The Book of Common Prayer is a beautiful collection of religious literature, isn't it? I'm a poet, and I love the poetic beauty of the BCP.
     
  7. Kiffin

    Kiffin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,191
    Likes Received:
    0
    My beliefs are best summarized this way

    1655 Midland Baptist Confession of Faith

    1. We believe and profess, that there is only one true God, who is our God, who is
    eternal, almighty, unchangeable, infinite, and incomprehensible; who is a Spirit,
    having His being in Himself, and giveth being to all creatures; He doth what He will,
    in heaven and earth; working all things according to the counsel of His own will.

    2. That this infinite Being is set forth to be the Father, the Word, and the Holy
    Spirit; and these three agree in one.

    3. We profess and believe the Holy Scriptures, the Old and New Testament, to be the word and revealed mind of God, which are able to make men wise unto Salvation,
    through faith and love which is in Christ Jesus; and that they are given by
    inspiration of God, serving to furnish the man of God for every good work; and by
    them we are (in the strength of Christ) to try all things whatsoever are brought to
    us, under the pretence of truth.

    4. That though Adam was created righteous, yet he fell through the temptations of
    Satan; and his fall overthrew, not only himself, but his posterity, making them
    sinners by his disobedience; so that we are by nature children of wrath, and defiled
    from the womb, being shapen in iniquity and conceived in sin.

    5. That God elected and chose, in His Eternal counsel, some persons to life and
    salvation, before the foundation of the world, whom accordingly He doth and will
    effectually call, and whom He doth so call, He will certainly keep by His power,
    through faith to salvation.

    6. That election was free in God, of His own pleasure, and not at all for, or with
    reference to , any foreseen works of faith in the creature, as the motive thereunto.

    7. That Jesus Christ was, in the fulness of time, manifested in the flesh; being born of
    a woman; being perfectly righteous, gave himself for the elect to redeem them to
    God by his blood.

    8. That all men until they be quickened by Christ are dead in trespasses -- Ephesians
    ii.1; and therefore have no power of themselves to believe savingly. But faith is the free gift of God, and the mighty work of God in the soul, even like the rising of
    Christ from the dead . Therefore consent not with those who hold that God hath given power to all men to believe to salvation.

    9. That Christ is the only true King, Priest, and Prophet of the Church.

    10. That every man is justified by Christ ; apprehended by faith; and that no man is
    justified in the sight of God partly by Christ and partly by works.

    11. That Jesus of Nazareth, of whom the scriptures of the Old Testament prophesied,
    is the true Messiah and Saviour of men; and that He died on the cross, was buried,
    rose again in the same body in which He suffered and ascended to the right hand of
    the majesty on high, and appeareth in the presence of God, making intercession for
    us.

    12 That all those who have faith wrought in their hearts by the power of God,
    according to his good pleasure, should be careful to maintain good works, and to
    abound in them, acting from principles of true faith and unfeigned love, looking to
    God's glory as their main end.

    13. That those who profess faith in Christ, and make the same appear by their fruits,
    are the proper subjects of Baptism.

    14. That this baptizing is not by sprinkling, but dipping of the persons in the water,representing the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ.

    15. That persons so baptized ought, by free consent, to walk together, as God shall
    give opportunity in distinct churches, or assemblies of Zion, continuing in the
    Apostles' doctrine and fellowship, breaking of bread and prayers, as fellow-men
    caring for one another, according to the will of God. All these ordinances of Christ
    are enjoined in His Church, being to be observed till his Second Coming, which we
    all ought diligently to wait for.

    16. That at the time appointed of the Lord, the dead bodies of all men, just and
    unjust, shall rise again out of their graves, that all may receive according to whatthey have done in their bodies, be it good or evil.

    [ November 06, 2001: Message edited by: Kiffin ]
     
  8. Kiffin

    Kiffin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,191
    Likes Received:
    0
    I love the Book of Common Prayer though I don't like some of the paedobaptist theology nor the the 1979 adding prayers for the dead in it. I have major problems with that.That was not in earlier versions.

    I use the BCP in my ministry and for personal devotions. It is truly beautiful. I have both the 1662 and 1979 versions. I especially like the ministry to the sick in the 79 Prayer Book. I thought I was the only Baptist who like the BCP.

    Michael and Josh be carefull! You do know that Archbishop Cranmer the author of the BCP was a Calvinist [​IMG] Might win ya'll fellas to the 5 points yet.

    Josh, Is your Church liturgical? Mine is semi liturgical..I quess you might say. Do you actually use the BCP for worship? I'm curious if your church follows is strictly or loosely.

    [ November 06, 2001: Message edited by: Kiffin ]

    [ November 06, 2001: Message edited by: Kiffin ]
     
  9. Rev. Joshua

    Rev. Joshua <img src=/cjv.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    2,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    Kiffin,

    We follow it pretty closely. As baptists, we feel free to use other liturgies or restructure the service as appropriate. When we do so, however, it is intentional.

    The BoCP offers a beautiful and historical framework for Christian worship. Combined with the Christian Year it offers congregants an opportunity to have a healthy, full worship experience that is meaningful on several levels. I'm a big fan.

    Joshua
     
  10. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Kiffin,

    It is said that the BCP has influenced more people than any other book in the English language, second only to the Bible. I, too, have a problem with the baptismal sacramentalism, but as a worship resource of great beauty, it is unsurpassed.
     
  11. Chris Temple

    Chris Temple New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Michael Wrenn:
    Chris,

    That is a lie; I do not think it is all about me. If that's the kind of **** you have to say to me, don't say anything else.

    You don't know my heart or my spiritual condition.

    You've got a fall coming; I can't say I'll be sorry when it happens. That's not Christlike, but neither are you.
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Proverbs 15:31-33 (ESV)
    The ear that listens to life-giving reproof
    will dwell among the wise.
    [32] Whoever ignores instruction despises himself,
    but he who listens to reproof gains intelligence.
    [33] The fear of the Lord is instruction in wisdom,
    and humility comes before honor.

    Praying for you.
     
  12. Brian

    Brian New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2001
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please explain why you believe spiritual birth and physical birth can't be compared when Jesus himself used the analogy.

    Brian

    [ November 06, 2001: Message edited by: Brian G ]
     
  13. Manstrom

    Manstrom New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2001
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    Michael,
    I think #22 is very much new age. All people do not have the "light of Christ" in them. I get real uncomfortable when the discussion gets to the "lights within" kind of thing. Glad to see you are still hanging in there.

    Agape,

    Mike
     
  14. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mike,

    I'm not using it that way--new age, that is; any true teaching can be distorted. I base my belief on John 1:9 and on the way the General Baptists, Quakers, Methodists, and Salvation Army have held this doctrine.

    Thanks for the encouragement. [​IMG]
     
  15. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Brian,

    Jesus CONTRASTED physical and spiritual birth. The will is not involved in one's physical birth; it is in spiritual birth, and freeeom to choose remains after conversion.

    Calvinists will not agree, of course.

    Chris,

    I will gladly take reproof and instruction from God--and I have taken much of both already. But I won't take it from someone who neither knows me nor what I've been through--especially from someone who despises me and my beliefs.

    I'll repeat--God alone is Lord of my conscience.
     
  16. Brian

    Brian New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2001
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    If I understand Calvinism right they don't really believe that you have a choice to begin with.

    I don't see the contrast of the birth idea. Jesus says that what is born of flesh is flesh and that which is born of spirit is spirit. Flesh and Spirit are contrasted but not birth. So this is one place we sure disagree. Birth is birth and you can't unborn. God is not the author of confusion and if Jesus wanted to contrast birth He would have. Instead He contrasts flesh and Spirit. Using birth as a common point of refference to do so. John 3:6&7

    "That which is born of flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again."

    Where is the contrast of birth? I see the differences between physical and Spiritual birth but not different births. Again you can't get unborn in any way.
     
  17. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,285
    Likes Received:
    507
    Faith:
    Baptist
    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Brian G:
    If I understand Calvinism right they don't really believe that you have a choice to begin with.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Quick note to remind you that THIS calvinist believes in choice and free will of every man. Just, sadly, our will/choices are in bondage to our fallen nature so that when we make the choice, it is always the "wrong" one! Even out "right" choices are filthy rags. Read that somewhere! :cool:

    Now you can get back to the subject at hand of stoning Mr. Wrenn for heresy! :eek:
     
  18. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Brian,

    You said that you see the differences between physical and spiritual birth but not different births--but, Brian, physical birth and spiritual birth ARE different births; that's the point Jesus was making. One of these--physical birth--did not involve your consent or will; the other--spiritual birth--does.

    That's one thing that's repulsive about Calvinism, to me--it in effect makes spiritual birth and physical birth alike, in that people have no choice in either. So, once you are overwhelmed by God and saved, you can't later reject that salvation by an act of your will. Calvinism says that you didn't have any freedom of choice before you were saved, and you still have none after.

    I totally disagree with that.
     
  19. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bob,

    I thought I saw on the topics page that Chris Temple had replied again, just before your post, but I don't see his post here. What happened?
     
  20. Karen

    Karen Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2000
    Messages:
    2,610
    Likes Received:
    0
    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Michael Wrenn:
    Kiffin,

    It is said that the BCP has influenced more people than any other book in the English language, second only to the Bible. I, too, have a problem with the baptismal sacramentalism, but as a worship resource of great beauty, it is unsurpassed.
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


    Oh how true. I'm another SBC who often personally uses the Book of Common Prayer. I have the 1928 version. I also have a collection of liturgical hymnals whose words I love to read.

    Chris,
    Actually I have considered this a very interesting thread and not "all about Michael". Reminds me of when I was in school and we read a lot of theory, then we had a case study to discuss.

    Karen
     
Loading...