NCAA basketball playoffs

Discussion in 'Sports' started by Salty, Mar 27, 2010.

?

In NCAA basketball playoff I would like to see

  1. An increase in teams

    1 vote(s)
    20.0%
  2. Double elimination

    1 vote(s)
    20.0%
  3. Winners of NCAA and NIT play each other

    1 vote(s)
    20.0%
  4. Other

    2 vote(s)
    40.0%
  5. Leave it the way it is

    2 vote(s)
    40.0%
  6. More cheerleaders

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,109
    Likes Received:
    219
    So wht would you like to see
     
  2. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,109
    Likes Received:
    219
    Please vote, because after the NCAA winner is announced, no one will care. :tear:

    Vote early, vote often :tongue3:


    say, how about the loosing NCAA men's team playing the winner of the womens NCAA team?
     
  3. TomVols

    TomVols
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    No to double elimination. No to the NCAA/NIT winners playing.

    We can eliminate one At-large bid and get rid of the silly play in game...er, I mean opening round. But with that cat out of the bag and with NCAA all but saying expansion is wanted by the networks, expanding the opening round either to eliminate the weak sisters or lower seeded power conference teams is all but certain.
     
  4. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    agree with Tom, and do away with the stupid "play-in game."
     
  5. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,109
    Likes Received:
    219
    What should they do? "Play-out"?
     
  6. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm talking about that silly game they added a few years back, where two teams play for one of the #16 seeds.

    I think it's silly. Just pick the 64 teams and be done with it. Having a 65th team is silly. Key concept of this post: silly. Like the idea. silly.
     
  7. TomVols

    TomVols
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Eliminate one of the 34 at large bids and the play in is no longer needed. But that'll never happen. That means the Big East or ACC will lose a spot, and we can't have that now, can we?

    Actually, it might mean a deserving team from one of the middle power conferences (Big Ten, SEC) might lose a spot in reality. But did the Big East deserve 8 slots this year?

    I digress.....
     

Share This Page

Loading...