I am confused. I do not understand, for example, the dispute between James White and G.A. Riplinger. It seems to me, Riplinger regards the KJV as a 'New Age Bible'? Can you simplify things for me, please. I think I side with Riplinger, but cannot make out what he actually means with 'New Age Bibles'. Was it a book he wrote? It is not even clear to me whether Riplinger defends the NIV or not, yet does he talk about "The new versions (that) destroy the meaning" of several Scriptures. Aren't 'New Age Bibles', 'the new versions'?