1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Obama Administration Refuses to Accept Repayment of TARP Money.

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by North Carolina Tentmaker, Apr 6, 2009.

  1. matt wade

    matt wade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    78
    What about my post was not on topic? Did you miss all the parts where I talked about the money? How about answering this part of my post:

     
  2. Robert Snow

    Robert Snow New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    4,466
    Likes Received:
    3
    It's doubtful if you get an answer from Carpro unless he can work an insult in
    there somewhere.
     
  3. EdSutton

    EdSutton New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    Overlooked in the rhetoric I see on this thread is an important fact from the article, namely that of "the threat of an embarrassing public audit" on said bank.

    Banks are audited every day. In fact, one of my nieces is employed as a Bank Auditor, and who audits banks on a daily basis.

    However, such audits are normally confidential information to banking regulators and the Fed.

    My own bank, which is 'privately owned' routinely releases the report of the summary of their audits, both from the state auditor, and their own private auditors. They do not normally release the details, nor why should they?

    Why was this bank allegedly threatened with a "public audit" for the purpose of embarrassment, should be the real question here, IMO.

    Ed
     
    #23 EdSutton, Apr 7, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 7, 2009
  4. matt wade

    matt wade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    78
    I don't need you jumping to my defense. If you don't have anything to contribute to the thread, then just move on.
     
  5. LeBuick

    LeBuick New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ed, I read that a little differently from you. I wondered why the bank would find a public audit embarrassing??? Do they have something in their books they don't want us or their depositors to see?
     
  6. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bush may be gone, but the damage he did lives on.

    Funny too, how the crowd who cries "Bush isn't President" come from the same group that always blamed everything bad that Bush had to deal with on President Clinton. Oh the shoe fits the other foot quite nicely, doesn't it?
     
  7. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    7,727
    Likes Received:
    873
    Faith:
    Baptist
    More BDS!! :sleep:

    (Just to use your own tactics!):laugh:
     
  8. North Carolina Tentmaker

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    1
    MP, I just don't understand where you are coming from. No one is defending Bush here. Most conservatives loathed Bush, I know I did.

    Now I would be the first to say he was light years better than Obama, but there was nothing good about Bush worth defending. The problem is that the damage Bush did continues to get worse and worse under Obama.

    We need a return to conservative values, something we have not had in a president since 1988.
     
  9. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Your mention of "Bush".

    That puts you in company with the other Bush haters here. If you like their company , keep taking threads about the policies of Obama off topic by trying to divert attention to Bush.
     
  10. matt wade

    matt wade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    78
    Have you read the OP? I quote, "Under the Bush team a prominent and profitable bank, under threat of a damaging public audit, was forced to accept less than $1 billion of TARP money." The OP posted about Bush, so is he off topic? Why am I the one of topic when the OP had a quote about Bush?
     
  11. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Just because the OP mentions Bush does not mean he is the subject of the OP.

    The subject is The Obama Administration's refusal to accept repayment.

    Now stop whining and get back on topic.
     
    #31 carpro, Apr 7, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 7, 2009
  12. matt wade

    matt wade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    78
    Who's whining? You are the one whining about me being off topic. I've tried twice to engage you about Obama not accepting the money back and twice you've ignored it. How about a third time?

     
  13. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Gotta a link to a source?
     
  14. matt wade

    matt wade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    78
    Sure..here's info about the 402 million: link

    Here's info about the other that was just approved (but not yet paid): link
     
  15. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist

    Give up?

    Let me help you just a little. BoA has not repaid a cent of the TARP funds.

    The payments you are referring to were "dividends".
    IOW interest.

    Furthermore: Your CEO shoots from the hip a little too often.


    Emphasis on "will not allow".

    My advice is to know what you are talking about before you make rash statements.
     
  16. JustChristian

    JustChristian New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here is the key sentence in this article:

    Under the Bush team a prominent and profitable bank, under threat of a damaging public audit, was forced to accept less than $1 billion of TARP money.

    Given that the bank accepted government (maybe coerced by the Bush administration) they shouldn't get out so easily.
     
  17. matt wade

    matt wade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    78
    Ok carpro, you got me there regarding dividends :).
     
  18. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Here's a bank that refused all TARP money:


    http://www.reporternews.com/news/2009/jan/07/first-financial-bankshares-stock-soars-in-2008/

    First Financial Bankshares stock soars in 2008

    Performance third best among regional banks
    By Jared Fields (Contact)
    Wednesday, January 7, 2009


    While Wall Street was reeling last year and banks were being bailed out, Abilene's First Financial Bankshares was flourishing.

    The stock of Abilene's only publicly traded company rose by 47 percent in 2008.
    ___________________________________________


    Some banks still know how to do it right!:thumbs:
     
  19. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    This article in the WSJ demonstrates vividly O'bama rex's goals for this country, socialism. Joe the plumber recognized this. The pseudo-intellectuals and leftists didn't care, that is what they want. The independents were apparently too ignorant to face the truth. Then there is the Slobbering Love Affair that the media and many had with O'bama rex.

    Judge Napolatino is correct. This entire process is unconstitutional but then all thos folks mentioned above could care less.
     
  20. matt wade

    matt wade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    78
    What truth were independents too ignorant to face? That we didn't like Obama or McCain and somehow it is our fault that Obama was elected? If the republican party would have put up an actual conservative instead of a wishy washy has been maybe I would have voted for the republican candidate.
     
Loading...