Odrama continues his terror on the unborn

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Revmitchell, Feb 27, 2009.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,328
    Likes Received:
    786
    WASHINGTON - The Obama administration is moving to rescind a federal rule that reinforced protections for medical providers who refuse to perform abortions and other procedures on moral grounds.


    A Health and Human Services official said Friday the administration will publish an official notice of its intentions early next week, and open a 30-day comment period for advocates, medical groups, and the public. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the notice has not been finalized.


    The Bush administration instituted the rule in its last days. It has already been challenged in court. Pro-lifers hailed the Bush regulation, but abortion rights advocates say it could reduce access to other services, such as birth control.

    More Here
     
  2. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    I can see where this is going.....
     
  3. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
    I agree that Obama should not revoke this federal rule.

    However, the rule does not really "protect" medical providers. What this particular rule is all about is funding. Basically the rule withholds funding from institutions that don't follow the existing laws which do protect the medical providers. So, basically it was a rule that instutited a penalty for not following the law. So, yes, in a round about way it protects the medical provider, but the protection is really there with or without this rule.

    There are other (long standing) federal laws that already state that an institution can't discriminate against a medical provider if the provider his moral or "conscience rights". Those federal laws are not the subject of this. Of course, that doesn't mean they won't come under attack in the future.
     
  4. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Further evidence that O'bama is a rabid abortionist.
     
  5. Dr. Timo

    Dr. Timo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2009
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    what it says

    When someone like BHO gets that much of the vote what does that say about our country? I got flack for being an issue voter. Well if I'ld rather vote against a baby killer, and a homosexual agenda than for what some politician will put in my back pocket then that's my right!!! I don't think our country learned much from the Clinton era!!! Morality matters in public service!!! :smilewinkgrin: :godisgood:
     
  6. dragonfly

    dragonfly
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    As usual, much ado about nothing.
     
  7. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wasn't Clinton the one who balanced the budget? Brought us a period of wealth and prosperity even if the dot.com bubble later burst?
     
  8. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76

    No that would have been the republican congress.
     
  9. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    An article on the topic:

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=90240

    Like I said, I can see where this is going....OB/GYN doctors you must perform abortions or you won't get paid for your other services by Medicare, Medicaid, etc. Then the insurance companies will follow suit. It has always been that way - what the Feds do trickles down to private insurance and they duplicate the federal policy.
     
  10. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Absolutely not. :smilewinkgrin: It was the Republican Congress who forced Clinton to accept a balanced budget!:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
     
  11. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Terror" implies sentience. How many chickens did Co. Sanders terrorize?
     
  12. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,328
    Likes Received:
    786

    Does anyone know what this guy is saying?
     
  13. JustChristian

    JustChristian
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    But we learned a great deal during the Bush era. Don't elect a president who neither has the intelligence or the leadership capabilities to head the leader of the free world.
     
  14. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    That is good advice, just several month too late. Not that anyone would have listened. The O'bamamites are :BangHead: :BangHead: :BangHead: :BangHead:
     
  15. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,328
    Likes Received:
    786
    Now we have one who has less power than the speaker of the house.
     
  16. Andy T.

    Andy T.
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by billwald
    "Terror" implies sentience. How many chickens did Co. Sanders terrorize?



    Does anyone know what this guy is saying?


    He's saying that the unborn are no different than chickens. (Sentience=awareness.) Disgusting. And it's a clear violation of the Board policy of life beginning at conception. Reported.
     
  17. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Your name is appropriate for one who states that concerns raised by Christians over abortion is much ado about nothing.
     
    #17 OldRegular, Mar 3, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2009
  18. dragonfly

    dragonfly
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    Its not that Christians have a concern, it's that that seemingly is the ONLY thing that matters to some.
     
  19. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    50,000,000 babies slaughtered in the womb is a lot of "things" to be concerned about.
     
  20. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,328
    Likes Received:
    786
    It is only "seemingly" to those who want to ignore their politician who works to see that these children die every day.
     

Share This Page

Loading...