1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Our Bill of Rights

Discussion in 'History Forum' started by Van, Oct 20, 2023.

  1. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    27,003
    Likes Received:
    1,023
    Faith:
    Baptist
    In September, 1789, Congress approved the first amendments of our Constitution. In December, 1791 these became the first 10 amendments because they were ratified by a sufficient number of states.

    However, these did not eliminate slavery as a lawful institution within the states governed by our Constitution.
    Frederick Douglass considered those amendments our "Bill of Lies."

    When those amendments referred to "people" not all people were included.
     
  2. Reynolds

    Reynolds Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2014
    Messages:
    13,796
    Likes Received:
    2,468
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Slavery was dealt with in COTUS. 3/5 compromise.
     
  3. OnlyaSinner

    OnlyaSinner Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,081
    Likes Received:
    171
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The 3/5 compromise was made mostly for representation in Congress. The North had wanted zero count of slaves, the South full count, each wishing to have the greater number of Representatives. The status of the slaves themselves was essentially unchanged.
     
  4. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    27,003
    Likes Received:
    1,023
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The first ten amendments we supposed to protect the people from the tyranny of government infringement of our inalienable rights. However the government conveniently provided a loop hole by not defining "the people" as white males. Thus, like the Pharisees Jesus addressed, they appeared wholesome on the outside, but will filled with dead man's bones.

    Professing Christians claimed to follow Jesus, but then drew a distinction between slave and free, between male and female. And this embedded hypocrisy was not confined to southren "Christian" churches. Many northern churches was not outspoken when it came to abolition of slavery.

    In the north, anti-slavery speakers attempted to use "moral suasion" appealing to the "professed" attitudes of their "Christian" audiences, rather than appealing to the use of force.
     
  5. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    27,003
    Likes Received:
    1,023
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Since slavery was tolerated in many southern churches and racism was tolerated in many northern churches, abolitionists attempted to show the hypocrisy of professing Christ, and enabling slavery.

    Fredrick Douglass used his parody, The Slaveholders Sermon, to set his audience at ease, then mollify with humor, then drop the hammer of conviction, in his remarkably effective ministry for humanities inalienable right to liberty. He drew parallels within the Old Testament, always pointing to the hope for freedom for all of God's people.
     
Loading...