Pelosi: Children a burden on the states

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Revmitchell, Jan 26, 2009.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,293
    Likes Received:
    783
    Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi boldly defended a move to add birth control funding to the new economic "stimulus" package, claiming "contraception will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government."

    Pelosi, the mother of 5 children and 6 grandchildren, who once said, "Nothing in my life will ever, ever compare to being a mom," seemed to imply babies are somehow a burden on the treasury.

    The revelation came during an exchange Sunday morning on ABC's THIS WEEK.

    STEPHANOPOULOS: Hundreds of millions of dollars to expand family planning services. How is that stimulus?

    PELOSI: Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children's health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those - one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.

    STEPHANOPOULOS: So no apologies for that?

    PELOSI: No apologies. No. we have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy.


    http://www.drudgereport.com/flashpbc.htm
     
  2. Palatka51

    Palatka51
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,724
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just what is it with Democrats? Their fixation on human s*xuality boarders on fetishness. And they want to start educating our children from kindergarten. Josselyn Elders must feel vindicated.
     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,293
    Likes Received:
    783
    This is about population control and she thinks funding abortion and contraception is an economic stimulus. In other words the slaughter of children and population control is an economic stimulus.
     
    #3 Revmitchell, Jan 26, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 26, 2009
  4. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    This has the potential to get ungly, with more infant deaths.
    Immagine, kill babies, because their a burden. How long before those are forced abortions of poor people to ensure those babies do not become a burden.
     
  5. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,293
    Likes Received:
    783
    Such ideas certainly are perpetuated by the President.
     
  6. Palatka51

    Palatka51
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,724
    Likes Received:
    0
    You couldn't be more right Donna. This kind of mind set is leading right down the road to the killing of the elderly and the chronically ill. Some how though ugly just don't go far enough, I'd say diabolically hideous.
     
  7. SBCPreacher

    SBCPreacher
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,764
    Likes Received:
    0
    The next logical step is to kill the elderly because they're a burden to society. The mentally disabled are next. Who knows what comes after that. Kill the Christians because they're troublemakers?

    Edited: Yeah, what Pal said (apparently he types faster than I do).
     
  8. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    I certainly agree with all 3 of you. Anyone deemd a burden to the governement could be killed to unburden society.
     
  9. mcdirector

    mcdirector
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,292
    Likes Received:
    10
    I believe we've got historical precedence for this. It's not at all attractive . . .
     
  10. Scarlett O.

    Scarlett O.
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,833
    Likes Received:
    114
    You are right.

    It was satanic then.....and it's satanic now.

    The very notion that human beings, no matter what their status, are burdensome to "society" and should be eliminated is a lie from the devil.

    I personally think that Paris Hilton, Snoop Dog, Madonna, and Hugh Hefner have burdened society to the point of breaking our moral backs, but I don't want to kill them for it.

     
  11. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,240
    Likes Received:
    2
    Remember, our president does think babies are a punishment.
     
  12. Scarlett O.

    Scarlett O.
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,833
    Likes Received:
    114
    .....and another thing....

    The book of James says that for the same tongue simply to speak blessings to God and curses to people who are made in God's image is not to be acceptable. He says that this type of speech from the tongue is set from the fires of hell.

    So if just bad-mouthing another human being, who is made in God's image, is hellish....

    .... then how much more hellish is actually scorning them to the point of deeming them unworthy to society and eliminating them.

    God created life and gives life.

    The devil will do anything to kill us all - and his best weapon seems to be to get us to kill each other.
     
  13. Palatka51

    Palatka51
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,724
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen and amen!!!!! May we endeavor to be diligent and not negligent in our duty to speak for life. And pray that all those who supported Obama are beginning to get a grasp of just what is at stake.
     
  14. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Amen to that. :tear: It's terribly ugly now and only the first week of him in office.

    Deliver us from evil.
     
  15. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pelosi is a nut case, no one minds if she raises our taxes in order to care for the millions of babies being made ward of the states since the parents are on drugs, in jail etc... We also don't mind paying a little more for the children on welfare so they can eat, have a roof and get good medical care... That is government spending I don't mind...
     
  16. windcatcher

    windcatcher
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,764
    Likes Received:
    0
    Diabolical is right: Few realize that there is something which many of our leaders... in both parties, have in common: They are members of the brotherhood of darkness, as I've heard one person characterize it, the Council for Foreign Relations and its kindred organization, The Trilateral Commission. Pelosi's husband attends the Bohemian grove where a human sacrifice in efigy is offered to the Owl god, molech as they rid themselves of all care. With Rockerfeller, Kissinger, and others are circulated ideas that many problems are caused by populations.... and particularly the poor, and that their world would improve if the population was drastically reduced. Some of their ideas have been imported..... particularly China took an interest in some of Kissinger's writings, and began its limits to one child based upon this. We have some good people in government.... but it is hard for them to compete with others who count their bonds of 'brotherhood' through this and that organization as great or greater than party loyalty: who purposely cloak programs intended to work one end.... that of reducing population in the semantics which sound like charity and compassion. Lately, they've been successful in the greatest theft the world has ever known. While many believe they want to share the wealth, they have already absconded with moneies and bailouts which protect their own investments and bonuses while iheaping hugh debts upon the rest of us, and disappointing us with their promises: instead of capital for construction loans or businesses which have been credit worthy and viable.... the banks hoard what government offered, and we pay the price in unemployment, taxes, increased government debt, and eventually in inflation when our money is devalued, thus they impoverish more people. If they really cared..... instead of condoms for kids, they'd be putting the money into state run health care programs for the poor. Instead of money for abortions on foreign soil, they'd be giving reduced loans for continuing education, or for helping people restructure their debts to manageable levels or for paying off the national debt, or return resources to the states and let the states determine where it is needed most in their failing budgets. But it is clear they don't care about the people or about the poor, or about those who are already working hard but barely clinging to the medium level of living.

    Notice how they promote the incompetency of their own.... A tax evader gets barely a slap on the wrist 'for making a mistake of oversight' and gets his appointment to what level of competence? Those who's greedy policies increased risks to unacceptible levels in freddie and fannie.... got their bonuses for exceptional years of 'performance' ......which was doctored to appear so.... and some are already in other positions of trust as are some of the very bankers and finaciers which saw their firms in need of bailouts or go bust!

    Now, if they are successful in their game, not only will they control the wealth, and the resources, but they will have impoverished the general population sufficiently to convince some that people are the problem and that less means more: Some are already lectured to in schools of medicine as to the advantages of euthaniasia, or with holding life-saving supports according to perceptions of human worth. Look out for groups to fall into disfavor and be falsely blamed for the fiasco alreadybegun by cronnies in government and business.

    I have no faith in this current administration for any good thing! It is already made up of too many well seasoned and well positioned in the very policies which have brought the nation to this point..... and Obama is the NWO kid, with the unholy annoitment and blessing of the Bilderberg meeting of last year in Virginia, (another group participating in the brotherhood of darkness.... not an official name but one which correctly expresses the evil and bond of connections).
     

Share This Page

Loading...