Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by mandym, Aug 8, 2012.
Did Hillary Clinton and Elanor Roosevelt show up for the meeting?
Shows that she is still one of the most evil women in the world and does not have a clue that she's speaking to demonic spirits if anything.
My thoughts exactly.
My best friend knows her personally.
He says that she is the nicest person you wanted to meet.
He cannot stand her poltics, but said she was very very nice.
I don't know if she was speaking allegorically or not, but this is no worse than Nancy Reagan's consulting astrologers. Mystical thinking at best.
I don't take much of what Congresswoman Pelosi says very seriously. She believes health insurance coverage is found in the Constitution.
Nice people can be deceived by demonic spirits.
Nancy Reagan held seances.
With all of the immorality, drinking, and possible drugs and more that has gone on in our White House, there is probably a heavy presence of demonic spirits there influencing the policy decisions made and the actions of some.
There are even some who say the WH is haunted.
A good exorcism is in order. The Bible warns about "wickedness in high places."
Puh-leeze, people. She was obviously waxing metaphorically. If you understood the threat Feminism itself poses to liberty and justice you wouldn't have to exaggerate one's rhetorical offenses.
I was having trouble in passing chef school several years ago, and was praying about it. All of the sudden, the spirit of Richard Nixon appeared and said, "I am not a cook."
And the answer to that is to put a guy there who thinks that Jesus and Satan are brothers? Is that any less evil that speaking to spirits?
Hmmm, how many dead feminists can fit under Nancy Pelosi’s rear end?
It’s just such a shame that her family doesn’t have the decency to keep her on her meds! But then, it was probably gas and had nothing to do with dead people.
The writers of 1st and 2nd Samuel who reported that Saul had a conversation with the spirit of (dead) Samuel were nice people who were deceived by evil spirits?
> She believes health insurance coverage is found in the Constitution
You have changed the topic . . . but you don't think universal health care will be good the general welfare of the US?
Do you understand anything about the basis of insurance principles?
Funny how Ms. Pelosi invokes the memory of Susan B. Anthony, seeing that Ms. Anthony was against abortion and all… anytime Nancy Pelosi is questioned about her radical pro-abortion stance, she usually retreats to some variation of “hey, I’m a faithful Catholic!” I see her as the poster child for inadequate catechesis.
I really can't say whether Nancy Pelosi is evil, delusional, or mentally ill. It would be a good idea if her bishop were to have a chat with her, stat, and if need be tell her that she should align herself with 'a church' that is comfortable with her paganism. Wicca or the Episcopal Church.
Well, how about keeping 'a guy there' that thinks killing babies is just swell? I wonder what the Lord sees as the greater evil.
Christians willing to vote for pro-abortion candidates and politicians when there are alternatives. A president that obviously has no problem with stripping innocent unborn girls - and boys - of their fundamental human rights, beginning with the right to life. No wonder the U.S. is increasingly looking like a country under judgment.
Again with the religious litmus test for President.
Nope - just noting the hypocrisy of condemning Pelosi and excusing Romney.
I have enough problems with Gov Romney to worry about his religion.
Just seem hypocrtical to condemn Pelosi and support a guy who thinks Jesus and Satan are brothers. How is one wrong (or okay) and not the other?
Sorry but that is not what you said. Why is that? You said nothing about hypocrisy until now? Why? Are you trying to play gotchya games?
My next question for you is, is it your position that unless we only support a true Christian then this issue with Pelosi should never come up?
Honestly I do not understand how you see the two as equivalent? What I have noticed is you commonly like to try to make conservatives out to be inconsistent and you do it very, very frequently but you never play that game with liberals. Why is that?