1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

President Bush: "a wiretap requires a court order"

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by KenH, Feb 1, 2006.

  1. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,006
    Likes Received:
    1,492
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "Secondly, there are such things as roving wiretaps. Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so. It's important for our fellow citizens to understand, when you think Patriot Act, constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland, because we value the Constitution.

    But a roving wiretap means -- it was primarily used for drug lords. A guy, a pretty intelligence drug lord would have a phone, and in old days they could just get a tap on that phone. So guess what he'd do? He'd get him another phone, particularly with the advent of the cell phones. And so he'd start changing cell phones, which made it hard for our DEA types to listen, to run down these guys polluting our streets. And that changed, the law changed on -- roving wiretaps were available for chasing down drug lords. They weren't available for chasing down terrorists, see? And that didn't make any sense in the post-9/11 era. If we couldn't use a tool that we're using against mobsters on terrorists, something needed to happen.

    The Patriot Act changed that. So with court order, law enforcement officials can now use what's called roving wiretaps, which will prevent a terrorist from switching cell phones in order to get a message out to one of his buddies."

    - LINK - Remarks by President Bush on 4/20/2004
     
  2. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    So he cannot claim ignorance of the law?
     
  3. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    He doesn't need to.
     
  4. elijah_lives

    elijah_lives New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did you expect the President to expose the NSA program himself? I doubt that this is the first president to use misinformation to keep the bad guys off balance. It simply doesn't bother me. He uses inherent presidential authority that EVERY modern president has both claimed, and used, regardless of political persuasion.
     
  5. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It bothers me.

    The law needs to be clarified on this issue. I don't think Bush did anything wrong but what he did needs a governing statute to ensure that a President Hillary doesn't use wiretaps on her political enemies the way she probably did with the 500 FBI files.
     
  6. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Much ado about nothing. [​IMG]
     
  7. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,006
    Likes Received:
    1,492
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I am surprised, LadyEagle, that you haven't latched on to Snoopgate to bolster your case for this NWO that you are so alarmist about.
     
  8. Bunyon

    Bunyon New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    He said it because they are not wiretapping in a classical sense. A super computer is scanning communications for key words. No one is listening to you conversation with your bookie or mistress. Why would a computer need a warrent to scan for key words?
     
  9. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,006
    Likes Received:
    1,492
    Faith:
    Baptist
  10. elijah_lives

    elijah_lives New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    0
    I went in with my step-father back in 1980 to visit his workplace (can't tell you which agency), where he explained the key word communications concept. That was part of his job. Way back then.
     
  11. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    I agree with LE. Small potatoes. We got bigger fish to fry. ;)
     
Loading...