Movement among liberals and now even some evangelicals (by far the majority of scholars) that promote pseudonymity in some Bible books. It is believed that Paul did NOT write Ephesians, I Timothy, II Timothy or Titus, nor did Peter write II Peter. Most argue that these books still belong in the canon of Scripture, although attributed to a writer falsely. They do, of course, destroy the verbal accuracy and claims of inerrancy, since they "say" they are written by Paul and this is false. Accepting this position seems to me to be a "low" view of the Scripture, opening it up to more subjectivism and undermining inerrancy. So it's up to you to share. Assume I'm 100% against the concept and assume Joshua is 100% for it! ( ) Where do you stand?