1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Question: "What is hyper-Calvinism and is it biblical?"

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by Revmitchell, Apr 5, 2013.

  1. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We hold that the death of Christ was atonement to fave those whom the cross was intended to save, the Elect, that he died a specific death for a specific group of people, not to atone for all sinners, else all would be saved!

    that is NOT hyper cal, just normal one!
     
  2. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist

    That is very hyper. And it is not found in scripture and a very skewed view of the sovereignty of God. No such view of God's sovereignty can be found in scripture.
     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    In the book "Whosoever Will; A biblical-Theological Critique of Five -Point Calvinism" Dr. David Allen wrote:

    "Moderate Calvinists......reject a strictly limited atonement, believe God's saving design in the atonement was dualistic:(1) He sent Christ for the salvation of all humanity so that His death paid the penalty for their sins, and(2) Christ died with a special purpose of ultimately securing the salvation for the elect."
     
  4. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are basically describing " 4 point" calvinists!

    I know, as once held that position, but was convinced by the scriptures that jesus died to secure REAl salvation of actual, not a potential kind!

    5 point calvinists NOT Hyper, as we still hold that one MUST receive Christ by faith to get saved, and that we MUST preach/teach christ to get that accomplished!
     
    #24 Yeshua1, Apr 9, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 9, 2013
  5. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Or in other words a "moderate".
     
  6. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thing is that you and I would agree that we must teach/speak/preach about jesus and the gospel...

    That God saves sinners by grace alone, faith alone!
     
  7. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Reformed men who did not teach 'limited atonement":

    John Calvin
    Heinrich Bullinger
    Thomas Cranmer
    Richard Baxter
    John Preston
    John Bunyan
    John Howe
    Zacharias Ursinus
    David Paraeus
    Steven Charnock
    Edward Polhill
    Isaac Watts
    Johnathon Edwards
    David Brainard
    Thomas Chalmers
    Philip Dodridge
    Ralph Wardlaw
    Charles Hodge
    Robert Dabney
    W.G.T Shedd
    J.C. Ryle
    A.H.Strong

    Source: David L. Allen, Steve W. Lemke. Whosoever Will A Biblical-Theological Critique of Five-Point Calvinism. Nashville Tennessee: B&H Academic, 2010.
     
  8. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "To bear the sines means to free those who have sinned from their guilt by his satisfaction. He says many meaning all, as in Romans 5:15. It is of course certain that not all enjoy the fruits of Christ's Death, but this happens because their unbelief hinders them. That question is not dealt with here because the apostle is not discussing how few or how may benefit form the death of Christ, bu means simply that He died for others, not for Himself. He therefore contrasts the many to the one." ~ John Calvin

    Source: torrence, Ed. D.W. Torrence and T.F., and Trans. W.B. Johnston. J. Calvin, The Epistle of Paul to the Hebrews and the First and Second Epistles of St. Peter. Grand Rapids Michigan: Eerdmans, 1963. pg.131


    Paul Makes common grace to all men, not because it in fact extends to all, but because it is offered to all. Although Christ suffered for the sins of the world, and is offered by the goodness of God without distinction to all men, yet not all receive Him." ~John Calvin

    Source: ibid, pg. 117-18
     
  9. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    believe calvin was teaching there that God offers salvation in the sense of a common grace towards all sinners,all are preached the gospel, but also ONLY intends and actual grants saving grace towards those who are Elect in chrsit, didn't he?
     
  10. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Nope................"Paul Makes common grace to all men, not because it in fact extends to all, but because it is offered to all."~ J. Calvin

    It is just historically false that the "TULIP" has been the only view of Calvinists or even the only predominant view among Calvinists.
     
    #30 Revmitchell, Apr 9, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 9, 2013
  11. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    actually, there has been universal agreement rearding 4 points, its just the one regarding if the intent of the atonement was unlimited/limited that gets disagreed upon!
     
  12. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,464
    Likes Received:
    1,575
    Faith:
    Baptist
  13. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    think only God knows that answer, for calvin , depending on which time of his writings, seem to teach both aspects of it at times!

    Will see also that careful readin gof ALL of his work would led one to presume that calvin held to a substitutionary atonement, and that definite provision in it was made for the Elect of god!
     
    #33 Yeshua1, Apr 10, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 10, 2013
  14. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,464
    Likes Received:
    1,575
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Let us remember, on the other hand, that while life is promised universally to all who believe in Christ, still faith is not common to all. For Christ is made known and held out to the view of all, but the elect alone are they whose eyes God opens, that they may seek him by faith. Here, too, is displayed a wonderful effect of faith; for by it we receive Christ such as he is given to us by the Father -- that is, as having freed us from the condemnation of eternal death, and made us heirs of eternal life, because, by the sacrifice of his death, he has atoned for our sins, that nothing may prevent God from acknowledging us as his sons. Since, therefore, faith embraces Christ, with the efficacy of his death and the fruit of his resurrection, we need not wonder if by it we obtain likewise the life of Christ. (John Calvin, Commentary on John, volume 1 3:16)
     
  15. FriendofSpurgeon

    FriendofSpurgeon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,243
    Likes Received:
    74
    Really?

    My guess is that that would be the view of all pastors and elders in every Presbyterian or Reformed church.

    However, I'm not sure about "Calvinist" or Reformed Baptists. However, John Piper seems to fit the mold. See attached link.

    http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/piper/piper_atonement.html
     
  16. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,464
    Likes Received:
    1,575
    Faith:
    Baptist
  17. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Which does nothing to disprove my point. It still stands.
     
  18. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I appreciate your integrity here.
     
  19. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Think thar Reformed christians take TULIP all points, while those of us reformed can be either 4/5 pointers!
     
  20. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I know you don't really care about grammar and spelling but could you re-post this in a way that is more coherent. (not just being critical but just trying to understand what you are saying here)
     
Loading...