Sarah Palin's personal e-mail hacked, displayed ?

Did McCain die today? I thought she was running for vice-president

 

Why would a Palin supporter hack her email?:tonofbricks:

 

I stand correct. Vice Presidential candidate.

 

It is possible that the hacker neither supports Obama or McCain. Some may be curious of all what she has to hide given the reports that have circulated about her dealings in Alaska...how she likes to fire and hire close childhood friends, how she prefers that important business is done via personal email... I got this info from a NY Times article...not a blog...although our media stinks too.

 

Uh huh, suuuuurre......

 

Are you April?

 

Carpro...how dare you resort to facts at a time like this? This woman's personal email was hacked and its only because she is guilty of some yet to be determined crime that may have to be created; this is not a time for facts!:laugh:

 

Yeah, the NY Slimes, yellow journalism at its best.

 

Spamming - this is the 3rd time you have repeated the same question

C4K
BB Admin

 

Those can't no but the troopergate investigators now know what accounts to have subpoenaed to retrieve the back up image from Yahoo. That would be admissible if they are able to retrieve it. However, I suspect the CEO of Yahoo is conservative so you know they won't have the copy...

 

c4k, why was my post deleted? I only asked if his question was answered, and if it wasn't, the fact one asks a question more than once does not constitute spamming.

FWIW, this is what spamming is. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...Spamming&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title

 

I would just let it go.

 

That's cool...I'm just curious. I think unnecessary censorship happens here on occasion based on a moderator or administrator's view, and not actually breaking any BB rule. We don't always see eye to eye, but I would never report your post on the basis of our disagreement, but violating a rule.

 

I guess no one is allowed to question the decision either.

 

Please return to the topic at hand. I have corresponded with the one member whose post I deleted, and he has suggested 'just leave it.'

Lets return to the topic at hand, or just close the thread.

 

There's more at stake here than your autocratic ruling.

If the spam rules have expanded to include the repeated asking of an unanswered question, we all need to know about it.

There are some memjbers here who chase other members all over the board, even to different topics, asking the same question.

Is this activity we should report as spam starting now?

Or is this a one time special case deal?

 

I have talked with the one individual involved. I am not going to discuss the issue any one else. The issue is closed. PLease take Revmitchell's wise advice above.

I will close this thread if it does not return to topic.

 

TooBlessed:

This is FACT? Perhaps I missed something... I don't mind links either. In fact, I don't believe anything without proof.

A google search on your IP number shows you work for the government. It's not very nice to bite the hand that feeds you...