In this thread I am asking Winman,RAdam,Cutter and any others some questions. Each of you may differ in your responses. (I didn't want to use the term KJVO in my heading.) Do you hold the Textus Receptus to the same level of respect as the KJV's? Or, do you simply stick with the KJV and not wish to deal with its textual basis? For those of you who regard the TR very highly as The only correct textual basis of the correct translation -- that of the KJV's --Which TR enjoys that seat of honor? Do you side with the Elzevir edition of 1633 or the Stephanus of 1550? Or do you favor another one like the Complutensian? Whichever TR you go with -- does it have textual perfection in your opinion? How do you account for the occasions in which the KJV doesn't go with the TR reading?