Sources: White House to Accept Torture Ban

Discussion in 'Politics' started by DavidsonBap, Dec 15, 2005.

  1. DavidsonBap

    DavidsonBap
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Someone's lying to you ... The know it alls on this website have made it clear that Bush is for torture and against the torture ban.

    Forget the news sources. Listen to the people on here.
     
  3. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    It passed Senate, the Republican-majority Senate.

    From the above link:
    The news sources agree with the people, well, most the people, on here.

    From a slightly later story, same site:
     
  4. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1
    I believe this is the right thing to do.
     
  5. Rocko9

    Rocko9
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] Thumbs up to the President on this one, it was the right thing to do.
     
  6. hillclimber

    hillclimber
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,075
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe it is a disaster, and the next GOP candidate for CIC, J. McCain is responsible.
     
  7. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen. [​IMG]
     
  8. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,258
    Likes Received:
    4
    I agree with hillclimber, a complete waste of time & money.

    Unfortunately, political hacks will say if you are against this measure, then you are for torture. A no-win situaton. Pretty soon making someone sit behind bars will be considered torture.
     
  9. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    You got that right.
     
  10. Baptist in Richmond

    Baptist in Richmond
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    5,075
    Likes Received:
    4
    Greetings from Buffalo, Bro. Curtis:

    Hope all is well with you and your wonderful family.

    The first sentence in the link provided in the initial post reads:

    Who among us would claim that this is a bad thing? What would be the rationale for claiming that this is a bad thing?

    Regards,
    BiR
     
  11. hillclimber

    hillclimber
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,075
    Likes Received:
    0
    BiR, My understanding is that we currently have plenty of laws and rules on the books keeping us behaving as the civilized nation we are. We have never condoned torture as a tool, and the enactment of this new law adds further restrictions on information gathering, that has absolutely no positive value.

    The emphasis here is on the FACT that the USA does not torture prisoners, and the liberals using isolated instances to instigate these new impediments to our security are grossly troubling.
     
  12. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    True, we outsource all our torture to Syria, Saudi Arabia and the like.

    See "extraordinary rendition" (link) for details.

    How many "isolated" incidents does it take to add up to a policy?

    McCain is hardly a liberal.

    The New Yorker has a pretty good article, including recent background, of this issue:
     
  13. Scott J

    Scott J
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is truly an issue of definitions.

    Most if not all of what went on at Abu Ghraib is not "torture" by any reasonable definition. It may not have been smart or even ethical... but much worse things have been done to college pledges.

    "Offending" a muslim by stepping on he Koran... is not torture. Isolating prisoners is not torture. Sleep deprivation is harsh but not "torture".

    Of course, there are those who will argue these things are torture... thus no ban will ever be effective unless we stop trying to gather intelligence from prisoners altogether... since they don't just offer it up because you ask them nicely.
     
  14. Scott J

    Scott J
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    0
    Daisy, Just what is your program for dealing with terrorism and those who hate us just because we are who we are and happen to now be the biggest kid on the block?
     
  15. DavidsonBap

    DavidsonBap
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    The government is doing the right thing and I'm glad they are going forward to stop torture. Many Christians hated what went on in Abu and Gitmo. Our prayers our answered. Those who want to play word games on what torture is or make excuses because they dislike Muslims...too bad and suck it up. Deal with it because the voice of reason has won.
     
  16. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,258
    Likes Received:
    4
    Yeah. They completely stopped torture, with one swipe of the pen. [​IMG]
     
  17. DavidsonBap

    DavidsonBap
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bro.Curtis, don't worry. You don't have to like it. Either way, this is a step in the right direction and it helps to make people accountable.

    I'm Lovin it [​IMG]
     
  18. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not torture, surely.

    International cooperation and police action for the most part. Limited military intervention when necessary.

    What's yours?
     
  19. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,258
    Likes Received:
    4
    Makes WHO accountable ? I look at it as another way to hate on military folks. And I sure wish you guys were as vocal about true crimes against humanity by the likes of Mugabe and Hussein, as you are about panties on the head in a chilly room. Maybe a scary dog in somebody's face. Or a koran that was mishandled.

    How 'bout them U.N. rape squads ? Who holds them responsible ? Or is it only the U.S. who needs a torture bill ?
     
  20. DavidsonBap

    DavidsonBap
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] Daisy

    Human rights should be every Christians concern.
    Torture is defined as causing excruciating physical or mental pain. What happened at Abu was certainly torture.
    This agreement makes people more accountable in the future. It doesn't wipe it out. It just moves us closer to better human rights.
    People can disagree all they want. But wisdom and compassion have prevailed.
    It is sad Christians have to debate if this is news to celebrate. But we know some fundamentalists have a bad cause of Islamophobia so their views should be marginalized.

    Our Church and many others have prayed for this, and it has come to pass.

    Praise Jesus!

    [ December 16, 2005, 12:02 PM: Message edited by: DavidsonBap ]
     

Share This Page

Loading...