Featured Systemic and Out of Control

I was going to ignore this, as I know it's the business as usual "who, what," routine you do. But I will draw a picture for you if I need to on the off chance you really can't see the difference between discussing the calls for cops being murdered leading to cops being murdered and the local wingnut who should have been in the looney bin. Please point me to the groups these people were listening to that were calling for cops to be killed? The article you linked said most were not associated with any group, except one father son pair that had "ties" to white supremacy groups.

A movement killed these cops, some crazies killed the others. There are still people on the streets and on the internet calling for more cop killings. Apples to pork rinds.

 

Rev. He is the master of "stick it in your face" postings. He accuses me of stalking, but someone who seeks out a bunch of links by another member and posts them to make a point is clearly stalking at its best. Watch out. He'll be hunting you down on line, checking out the Google photos of your home and describing your home to members next. He does this to intimidate and because he can.

As for his response to your comment, again he falls way short.

 

Of course it does. Their viewpoint is a warped as yours.

 

It has everything to do with it. The crazies wanted nothing more than attention. The media made sure they got it. They made them more famous than they could ever be any other way. Some are still alive and rolling around in that fame and attention. One channel actually didn't feed their egos. More channels should do it.

Ain't that sweet... has nothing to do with it. There is a difference between calling people out for their lack of Christian empathy for their fellow man, and that leading to racist actions, and a movement that is responsible 2, possible 3 deaths of innocent people.

Whatever gets you through the night.

Actually, it's casting aspersions on a movement, made up of more white hipster liberals than blacks, that is leading to violence. I notice you have not addressed the fact that Al Sharpton has supported and participated in protests that directly called for the deaths of police officers and did nothing to stop it until cops were actually killed, in the name of the movement.

Yep, unless of course they are criminals, as the two being held up as messiahs were. I have said it before, and I will say it again, Tamir Rice. Sweet Francis on a pimple. That was cold blooded murder. The support would be truly massive, and across all racial, political, social, financial boundaries, yet all we here about are Garner and Brown. Proof that a buncha race pimping morons are in charge.

I am burdened with the need to aid the intellectually challenged and dishonest.

 

I have no idea what he posts. Don't care. There was about three or four who began following me around the board harassing me so I have them on ignore. It appears I became their sole purpose for being on the board. I will leave them to it.

 

They covered the riots, the protests, and the resulting action of murder.

If I lay in the road screaming "kill the ice cream man," because he drove by and didn't stop and some yahoo goes and kills two ice cream men and says he did it because the ice cream man didn't stop for me and he was doing it in support of my protests... then I would be responsible. Funny you indicate I am a youth, yet you exhibit the typical millennial, "it ain't my fault," attitude. You protest, you call for the murder of cops, cops are murdered in support of your protest, you are responsible.

The movement called for cops to be murdered. Cops were murdered and the person who did the killing stated it was in support of the protests before he killed the cops execution style. Only the mentally challenged can try and duck out of that one.

Yes, because calling for the murder of police is non-violent.

He gave minor lip service to the idea while marching with people calling for the murder of cops. It's called hypocrisy. Does not alleviate Big Daddy Pimp from responsibility.

So, arguing to the point I am one of the most disliked people here, 2nd only to you possibly, and that makes me a supporter of racists on this forum? What does that make you then since you outpost me about 1000 to 1. That is so completely stupid it is beyond comprehension.

Yay, I am other white people now. Maybe Rev will admit I am a conservative now...

 

Zaac the neocons can't even be swayed by hard documented evidence from history and the government's own archives.

Media matters sure isn't going to do it.

FOX AFFILIATE CAUGHT DECEPTIVELY EDITING FOOTAGE OF POLICE PROTESTERS

A Fox affiliate out of Baltimore has been accused of deceptively editing a video, making it seem as though protesters in the nation’s capitol chanted, “Kill a cop,” when they were actually calling for accountability.

Over the past 24 hours, while giving background on the shooting deaths of two NYPD officers, WBFF thrice aired footage of a protest that took place in Washington D.C., last week, where demonstrators were filmed drawing attention to police violence.

“At this rally in Washington, D.C., participants chanted, ‘We won’t stop, we can’t stop, so kill a cop,’” WBFF reporter Melinda Roeder described while reviewing a video of protests posted last week.

View the WBFF video clip below:

http://www.infowars.com/fox-affiliate-caught-deceptively-editing-footage-of-police-protesters/

Fox45 released a statement today saying that they made “an honest misunderstanding of what the protesters were saying,” and that they apologized for the error.

So there ya have it. It was just "an honest misunderstanding".

Right.

 

You can try to tell yourself that this is a fact, but you are wrong. The lynch mob mentality of these protestors, whip up by Obama, Holder, de Blasio and Sharpton played a role in sending that gunman to Brooklyn that day!

This can't be debated .... because the killer had a gun. He shot and wounded his girlfriend. Then he traveled from Baltimore to Brooklyn (the sight of the now-infamous chant, "What to we want? Dead Cops! When do we want it? NOW!"). And he must have had ample opportunity to shoot and kill many cops from many different sheriff's, city and state patrol units; even so, he chose to go to Brooklyn and kill two NYPD cops.

Now, tell me I'm wrong? Of course, you will, and I expect to see my statement filleted and cherry picked with your stale, tried and not so true, responses!

However, and I mean this, regardless of what you think, if you would be honest with yourself, for the first time since joining this board, that facts don't lie. This man was caught up in the moment, and he traveled a long distance to do just what the mob called for! "Kill cops!"

 

As with every argument you promote around here, when the facts don't suit your "narrative," you devolve into trying to pick a fight with absurd insults. You are just another SJW that can't see the forest for all of the trees. Typical.

You are exactly what you accuse others on this forum of being. If anyone doesn't walk lockstep with you they are the enemy to be labelled, insulted, and ridiculed. You are that which you preach against and a class A hypocrite. Until I disagreed with Brown and Garner being held up as messiahs and protestors were calling for the death of innocent people you were quoting me and agreeing with me. Now I am a white privileged racist child throwing a temper tantrum. Thanks for playing!

:laugh: :wavey:

 

Wow! Here is a child calling someone else a "child!" Please note the BOLD imposed above as it points out who the child is and it clearly supports SN when he calims you resorts of hurling insults, etc.

I think Shagnappy nailed this one right! :thumbs:

 

Don't worry. They won't. They'll just end up wondering why a "liberal" would mention it.

If you catch Fox lying you're a liberal.

If you catch CNN lying you're a hero.

 

You did say he was a troll.:smilewinkgrin:

 

I did. I also said I rarely interact with him.

This was one of those rare occasions. :smilewinkgrin: