Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics' started by KenH, Dec 2, 2007.
And here is the other side of the story.
Could this be the reason why club for growth is vehemently against Huckabee? Do i smell something fishy here?
The rest of the story from that story link:
"Soloveichik acknowledged the connection but denied it had anything to do with the Club's focus on Huckabee. The group would attack his record regardless, she said."
They can deny it but given the connection and their biased analysis of Huckabee's record will somehow be suspicious.
Are you calling Ms. Soloveichik a liar?
I don't know. Only God knows! But i have the reason to be suspicious given their biased interpretation of Huckabee's record.
So if someone supports Huckabee you just accept it at face value but if someone criticizes Huckabee you are suspicious.
Never claim to be anything other than a typical political partisan just like the rest of us.