The fruits of NAFTA

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Brother James, Mar 10, 2006.

  1. Brother James

    Brother James
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    660
    Likes Received:
    0
    To view the entire article, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49201

    Friday, March 10, 2006
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    The fruits of NAFTA
    By Patrick J. Buchanan
    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    Posted: March 10, 2006
    1:00 a.m. Eastern


    As I write these lines, the big black headline on Drudge reads, "Arizona Governor Orders Troops to Mexican Border."


    Both Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano and New Mexico's Bill Richardson have now declared a "state of emergency" on their border.


    Why? Because our border is descending into a state of anarchy, as 5,000 illegal aliens daily attempt to cross our Mexican frontier and drug traffickers, with renegade Mexican army troops sometimes backing them up, attempt to run narcotics into the United States.


    It is now a dozen years since NAFTA passed. We can measure its success in the clamor for fences and troops on the border, and in Mexico's having displaced Colombia as the primary source of the marijuana, meth and cocaine flowing into the United States.


    But it was the economic argument that our elites - Bush I and James Baker, Dole and Gingrich, Clinton and Carter - used to sell NAFTA.


    In one of the big propaganda pieces of that great debate, "NAFTA: An Assessment," an October 1993 paper published by the International Institute of Economics, Gary Hufbauer and Jeffrey Schott wrote: "Our job projections reflect a judgment that, with NAFTA, U.S. exports to Mexico will continue to outstrip Mexican exports to the United States, leading to a U.S. trade surplus with Mexico of about $7 to $9 billion annually by 1995."


    The authors further predicted the U.S. trade surplus with Mexico would rise to $9 billion to $12 billion a year between 2000 and 2010.


    And what happened? Charles McMillion of MGB Services, using Commerce Department data through 2005, has tallied the results.


    A year after NAFTA passed, the U.S. trade surplus had vanished. From 1995 through 1998, we ran $20 billion trade deficits with Mexico. From 1999 through 2005, the U.S. trade deficit with Mexico grew every year, from $27 billion in 1999 to last year's $54 billion.


    Where Hufbauer and Schott had predicted $100-plus billion in trade surpluses with Mexico from 1994 to today, NAFTA delivered some $400 billion in cumulative U.S. trade deficits. A $500 billion mistake by the crack Hufbauer-Schott team.


    Is there a silver lining? Are we not selling Mexico high-value items, while she exports to us the products of her less-skilled labor?


    Again, the opposite has occurred. When NAFTA passed in 1993, we imported some 225,000 cars and trucks from Mexico, but exported about 500,000 vehicles to the world. In 2005, our exports to the world were still a shade under 500,000 vehicles, but our auto and truck imports from Mexico had tripled to 700,000 vehicles.


    As McMillion writes, Mexico now exports more cars and trucks to the United States than the United States exports to the whole world. A fine end, is it not, to the United States as "Auto Capital of the World"?


    What happened? Post-NAFTA, the Big Three just picked up a huge slice of our auto industry and moved it, and the jobs, to Mexico.


    Consider the range of items the most advanced nation on earth now sells to Mexico, and Mexico sells to us.


    Mexico's leading exports to the United States in 2005 were autos, oil, electrical machinery, computers, furniture, textiles and apparel. The Made-in-the-USA goods that reaped us the greatest revenue in trade with Mexico were plastics, chemicals, cereals, cotton, meat, paper, oil seed, aluminum, copper and knitted or crocheted fabrics.


    U.S.-Mexico trade calls to mind the trade relationship between Betsy Ross' America and the England of the Industrial Revolution, with Mexico in the role of England. Our exports to Mexico read like a ship's manifest from Bangladesh.


    The American people were had. NAFTA was never a trade deal. NAFTA was always an enabling act - to enable U.S. corporations to dump their American workers and move their factories to Mexico.


    For U.S. companies, it was one sweet deal. At zero cost, they were allowed to rid themselves of their American workers; get out from under contributing to Social Security and Medicare; and slough off the burden of environmental, health-and-safety, wage-and-hour and civil-rights laws - and were liberated to go abroad and hire Mexicans who would work for one-fifth to one-tenth of what their unwanted American workers cost.


    What NAFTA, GATT, Davos and the WTO have always been about is freeing up transnationals to get rid of First World workers, while assuring them they could hold on, at no cost, to their First World customers.


    When one considers who finances the Republican Party, funds its candidates, and hires its former congressmen, senators and Cabinet officers at six- and seven-figure retainers to lobby, it is understandable that the GOP went into the tank.


    But why did the liberals, who paid the price of mandating all those benefits for American workers and imposing all those regulations on U.S. corporations, go along? That's the mystery. About NAFTA there is no mystery. There never really was.


    © 2006
     
  2. gb93433

    gb93433
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,496
    Likes Received:
    6
    Things like this just move from one country to another.

    There was a time when people in the US quit working physically and academically in favor of laziness. Their parents began to tell them to take it easy and live life. Now they are adults and still lazy and will not work. They are complaining that their children are having to work so hard in schol and that school should be fun.

    Finally, the states are stepping up to the plate and ignoring the wishes of the lazy parents and requiring more of their students.
     
  3. Rocko9

    Rocko9
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    0
    We have heard this lie about lazy Americans for such a long time that some are convinced that it is true. Here is the real truth, American businesses wants cheap labor, American businesses do not want to provide good workplace environments. The American labor force got tired of being abused by the these types of businesses. American businesses reached out across the border to get cheap labor and justified it by telling the big lie that Americans are lazy and are only providing jobs for Illegal/Legal aliens because Americans are too lazy and do not want these jobs.
     
  4. saturneptune

    saturneptune
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    0
    The following is a list of the fruits of NAFTA

    1. George H. W. Bush
    2. Bill Clinton
    3. George W. Bush
     
  5. Rocko9

    Rocko9
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
    Ant that also includes the assorted nuts which are too many to mention
     
  6. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Preview. The American Union by 2005 – 2006 by Robert Gaylon Ross. Click Here.

     

Share This Page

Loading...