The Stream Promoting False Gospel

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by Dr. Bob, Sep 26, 2004.

  1. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    A friend (Bill Gray) wrote me and questioned a new cultic view being promoted:
    Thoughts?
     
  2. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    To implicate Watchman Nee in cultic practices simply because he supposedly taught Witness Lee at some point, is wrong. I have a whole shelf of Nee's work (Mostly early writings)and for the most part I find him to be a very Godly man and his works to be very edifying.

    Lacy
     
  3. Pete Richert

    Pete Richert
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    0
    Watchman Nee isn't exactly a cult leader, though he had some strange beliefs. Witness Lee and the local Church are definitly a cult. The Local Church is famous for hiding its denomination in its recruiting, publications, etc. I even got a NT Study Bible written by them without ever knowing it was Local Church (until I investigated who did the notes). Good thing I checked NO when they asked if I wanted someone to follow up with me. BTW, don't say the Local Church is a cult, they are also famous for suing people who claim they are a cult.
     
  4. Marcia

    Marcia
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pete Richert is right. Watchman Nee has some very strange and troubling teachings; some of these were passed on to Witness Lee who founded the Local Church and taught a mystical brand of Christianity with practices like "pray-reading." Many of Lee's ideas came from Nee. The Local Church is cultic and they do sue some people who say so.

    Here are some links with info:
    Info on the Local Church
    http://www.lcinfo.org/

    Below excerpt is on Watchman Nee from http://www.apologeticsindex.org/n00.html#neew

    If you scroll down a bit, you'll find Watchman Nee which has links to further info
    More links on Nee
    http://www.apologeticsindex.org/n01.html
    http://www.xenos.org/essays/nee1.htm

    Detailed info on The Local Church with links
    http://www.apologeticsindex.org/l40.html
     
  5. Frogman

    Frogman
    Expand Collapse
    <img src="http://www.churches.net/churches/fubc/Fr
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2001
    Messages:
    5,492
    Likes Received:
    0
    This sounds similar to what an elder of the Church of Jesus Christ of LDS told me they believe, similar, but not exactly the same.

    Bro. Dallas

    BTW, I believe the tree of life typifies Christ. Is that cultic? :cool: ;)
     
  6. Craigbythesea

    Craigbythesea
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    5,500
    Likes Received:
    20
    It's not non-Christian cultic, but it is out of the ballpark.
     
  7. Craigbythesea

    Craigbythesea
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    5,500
    Likes Received:
    20
    Amen!
     
  8. christopherbarny

    christopherbarny
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2002
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've never heard of Witness Lee or Watchman Lee. I do know that I am supposed to beware of false prophets. Everything that I hear regarding spiritual truth gets filtered through my Bibles, regardless of the source. There are a lot of magazines, books, newsletters, and the like that are deceptive. I stay away from all of them. Temptation comes from many sources. Remember, Satan tried using scripture to lead Jesus astray!
     
  9. Frogman

    Frogman
    Expand Collapse
    <img src="http://www.churches.net/churches/fubc/Fr
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2001
    Messages:
    5,492
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's not non-Christian cultic, but it is out of the ballpark. </font>[/QUOTE]A homerun? :D ;)
     
  10. rufus

    rufus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Messages:
    730
    Likes Received:
    0
    Watchman Nee was a Christian mystic.
     
  11. APuritanMindset

    APuritanMindset
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    Messages:
    229
    Likes Received:
    0
    That view seems similar to something that is believed by Paul Crouch on TBN. Kenneth Copeland, and the Crouches promote something about how they are all little gods. That God makes no distinction between Himself and man and that once we're Christians, we become God too.
     
  12. Craigbythesea

    Craigbythesea
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    5,500
    Likes Received:
    20
    No, a theological absurdity. :(
     
  13. Marcia

    Marcia
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen! </font>[/QUOTE]I agree Nee should not be implicated because of Witness Lee's beliefs, but he can be implicated for his own beliefs and teachings. Also, we can implicate Nee in cultic practices if he taught them, whether to Witness Lee or to anyone else. As the links show, Nee did have clear cultic and aberrant teachings.
     
  14. Craigbythesea

    Craigbythesea
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    5,500
    Likes Received:
    20
    Before I burn the man at the stake, I would like to see quotes, in context, from his writings that prove that he taught doctrines of a non-Christian cultic kind.
     
  15. Marcia

    Marcia
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Before I burn the man at the stake, I would like to see quotes, in context, from his writings that prove that he taught doctrines of a non-Christian cultic kind. </font>[/QUOTE]No one is talking about burning anyone at the stake. :rolleyes: If you read the links, there is enough info to create at least a concern. If you can't accept what anyone says about Nee, then check Nee's books for yourself. The fact that many sound Christians have investigated him and found huge problems should go for something, but if that means nothing to you, Craig, then read through a couple of Nee's books.
     
  16. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    Wise. Same way I felt.

    So I started a thread to that end some time ago. Feel free to come by and look at the links and the evangelical apologists who have raised eyebrows with the doctrines of Nee.
     
  17. Craigbythesea

    Craigbythesea
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    5,500
    Likes Received:
    20
    I have been "concerned" about the teachings of Watchman Nee for 35 years. I read the links that were posted and they were nothing but opinions from men who believe differently. Don't run a man down unless you have solid evidence that he deserves it. Where are the actual quotes in context from Nee’s writings? Self-righteousness in the name of theological correctness has no place in a Christian community.
     
  18. freeatlast

    freeatlast
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thoughts? </font>[/QUOTE]I have a question here. I have on several occasions posted something from an article and got rebuked by a moderator and even had the post edited. Why is not the ground level when a mod posts an article or part of one which is copy righted? I am always told to go through the channels but it NEVER does any good. It looks like a old buddy system. Can any understanding be given? I realize that you want this to be done in private but in private it gets covered up and excuses made. Why is the ground rules not the same for everyone?
     
  19. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    To give a few paragraphs in direct quotation from an article with the source is done all the time. It is part of a scholarly debate. To take more than a short quotation or not give credit/link can be plagiarism and that is jumped on regularly.

    I am sorry if something of yours was clipped. Perhaps it fell into that latter category??

    And remember, the ground isn't level. Some are more equal that others. Get over it and learn to cope. [​IMG] [​IMG] [tongue-in-cheek icon inserted here]
     
  20. Marcia

    Marcia
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Excerpt of testimony of former Local Church member:
    Home page of site giving various sources of info on the Local Church:
    http://www.lcinfo.org/?page=home
     

Share This Page

Loading...