The truth behind the birther movement

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Salty, May 26, 2011.

  1. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,129
    Likes Received:
    221
  2. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    I read it. It says it's all about money. Baloney!

    When did you become a socialist Salty? Corsi has every right in the world to profit from his work it's called capitalism.

    Have you read the book? Have you looked at the evidence in it?
     
    #2 poncho, May 27, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: May 27, 2011
  3. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    The WH is afraid of the information disclosed in Corsi's book. AOL is hoping to convince people that the book itself and the information it contains is old news and has been debunked by the Obama administration's "pre emptive" posting of Obama's fraudulent BC.

    Obama has publically endorsed this BC and so has boxed himself in. He either has to prove this latest BC is the real deal or demonize his opposition or put limits on or ban any form of dissent.

    So far he has choosen the later.

    Esquire, another AOL controlled liberal magazine published a hit piece trying to convince people that Corsi and Farrah pulled Corsi's book from the shelves. Apparently attempting to scare people from purchasing the book or to make them believe it's just more "birther nonsense".

    BREAKING: Jerome Corsi's Birther Book Pulled from Shelves! (warning this article is rated R)

    Within just a few hours Esquire had to add this . . ."disclaimer"

    This was added only after this article managed to convince alot of people including some well known radio hosts who interviewed Corsi that WND actually pulled the books from shelves. Farrah is now sueing Esquire.

    Note . . . Esquire says, "This is despicable, and deserves only ridicule." No this deserves honest reporting of all the facts. Something that Esquire and AOL is either not willing or capable of doing. What Esquire and AOL is doing is despicable and they deserve to be called out for it and shown as the factually challenged propagandists that they are.

    The WH and what you would call the "liberal media" is trying to discredit Corsi, WND and anyone who would dare to disagree with or question this administration.

    So afraid are they of the information in this book and dissent against Obama's un american globalist policies that they have even created a new "ministry of truth" headed by a propagandist named Jesse Lee who evidently imagines himself to be the "terminator" of all who dare to question this administration's policies and motives.

    In a bid to ‘squash negative stories’ about Barack Obama that appear on the Internet, the White House has hired a dedicated propagandist whose role will be to savage people who tell “lies” about the President, in a chilling reminder of how prosecutors threatened people with jail time during the 2008 campaign if they criticized Obama.

    “The Obama administration has created and staffed a new position tucked inside their communications shop for helping coordinate rapid response to unfavorable stories and fostering and improving relations with the progressive online community,” reports the Huffington Post.

    The man tasked with the role of “disseminating push back” against Obama’s online critics by direct order of the White House will be Jesse Lee, a blogger who has previously put out White House spin in response to claims made by Glenn Beck.

    “The post is a new one for this White House. Rapid response has been the purview of the Democratic National Committee (and will continue to be). Lee’s hire, however, suggests that a portion of it will now be handled from within the administration. It also signals that the White House will be adopting a more aggressive engagement in the online world in the months ahead.”

    SOURCE

    You seem to have something against American's searching for the truth, upholding the law and holding those who would knowingly violate it accountable Salty. Why is that? And doesn't it make you uncomfortable that you have to side with extreme liberals and their mouthpieces in the liberal media to try and block further discussion on this important issue?
     
    #3 poncho, May 27, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: May 27, 2011

Share This Page

Loading...