Third Eyewitness To San Bernardino Shooting Says It Wasn’t ‘Terror Couple’ Who Carried Out Attack

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by poncho, Dec 10, 2015.

  1. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    “It’s not him,” a third San Bernardino shooting witness proclaimed about Sayd Farook and his wife.

    The so-called “terror couple” have been accused of masterminding an ISIS terror attack on a Christmas office party where Sayd worked.


    Earlier this month, the attorneys for the Farook family maintained that they do not believe the suspects are the ones who carried out the attacksin question.

    Several eyewitnesses and family of witnesses and victims initially said that three athletic Caucasian men had been responsible for carrying out the attacks. Police immediately banned them from speaking with the media.

    Just days ago, another eye-witness in the office came forward and said that in spite of what the law enforcement and mainstream media narrative is saying, the people who carried out the attack where very athletic, large, Caucasian men, who were three – not two – in number. Farook’s wife, it should be remembered weighed approximately 90lbs.

    Now, a third prominent eye-witness, Chirs Nwadike, has stepped up to challenge the mainstream narrative.

    Continue . . . http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/12/eyewitness-to-san-bernardino-says-it-wasnt-couple/#



    Someone should be sitting this guy down and asking him some real questions. LIke asking for a detailed description of the shooter(s). This is some crumby reporting but that's the lamestream media for ya.

    Maybe I'll call my good buddy Alex and see if he'll send a real reporter out there to do a real interview.
     
    #1 poncho, Dec 10, 2015
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2015
  2. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,897
    Likes Received:
    294
    Wondering how the guy in the video "saw" anything. Wasn't he hiding in the restroom? At any rate, he did not describe anybody in the video, just insisted it couldn't have been Farook.

    You wasted bandwith with that one.

    Your other "eyewitness" described the killers as tall white men, but said:

    ‘I couldn’t see his face, he had a black hat on. All I could see was a black hat, black long-sleeved shirt… He had extra ammo. He was probably ready for something, to reload – I don’t know know…

    Even said she thought he was wearing gloves.

    How does she know what colot they are?

    Pure Garbage. You've been had, poncho.

    Again.
     
    #2 carpro, Dec 10, 2015
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2015
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
  4. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,542
    Likes Received:
    208
    Dang, Poncho, you're making it hard to decide who to hate....
     
  5. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,897
    Likes Received:
    294
    She obviously lied. No wonder the police and the FBI ignored her. Not credible at all.

    The guy never said he saw the shooters. He couldn't have. Poncho evidently didn't bother to read what he said.
     

Share This Page

Loading...