Tom DeLay Indicted

Discussion in 'Politics' started by go2church, Sep 28, 2005.

  1. go2church

    go2church
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,304
    Likes Received:
    6
  2. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    After 5, that is five, grand juries!
     
  3. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Six, not five!
     
  4. go2church

    go2church
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,304
    Likes Received:
    6
    Let's not forget the fact that the house rules had to be "set aside", the whole messy ethics "thing" that DeLay was sent to the woodshed for and his friends already in legal hotwater, yeah...he is clean as a whistle.
     
  5. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,949
    Likes Received:
    298
    Six, not five! </font>[/QUOTE]Ronnie Earl just kept trying until he found one who would go along with him.

    He's got a very weak case or the first Grand Jury would have indicted. It wouldn't have taken however many it took.

    He was mainly politically motivated and wanted to bring down Tom DeLay more than anything else. Even if he had to manufacture a case. He finally found the right combination to do just that.
     
  6. fromtheright

    fromtheright
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    carpro,

    My gut tells me you're right but I'll be watching closely to see if a conviction follows but I don't like crooks, especially the ones on my side. I hold my side to a higher standard, though for that reason I won't jump to a conclusion based on what may be a politically motivated campaign.
     
  7. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,949
    Likes Received:
    298
    Not to excuse breaking of the law but...

    I would say that if you have a dedicated prosecutor that spends 3 years looking into the campaign finances of every politician in Washington, 90 % of them would be indicted regardless of party. 100% is entirely possible. [​IMG]
     
  8. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Democracy in action. If the majority is doing it it's cool.
     
  9. Dragoon68

    Dragoon68
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,511
    Likes Received:
    0
    Our system of justice will, hopefully, correctly determine whether there was or was not any wrong doing by Tom DeLay.
     
  10. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,949
    Likes Received:
    298
    Something to remember about the criminal justice system in Texas.

    Indictments are easy to get. Any District Attorney can get almost anyone indicted for anything.

    Mr Earle also had Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson indicted on more than one occasion while she was a state official. When it came time for trial on one of those cases, Earle had no evidence to present. The judge dismissed the case on the spot.

    Earle knows that an indictment alone is enough to ruin a politicians reputation and possibly their career. It wouldn't surprise me if that was a factor in his zeal. He is on record as comparing DeLay to a "bully" I believe.
     
  11. Dragoon68

    Dragoon68
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,511
    Likes Received:
    0
    Apparently there's no limit to the number of times an indictment can be sought even for the same alledged offense. If a person repeats a lie enough times they'll even convince themself it's the truth. If it's a lie, which I suspect it is, then it shouldn't hold up in court before a judge and a jury if it comes to that.
     
  12. go2church

    go2church
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,304
    Likes Received:
    6
    Which is all the more reason that folks like DeLay should stop holding themselves up as some superior moral force within the government. As it turns out he is a weasel!

    There is no doubt that there are alot of folks in Washington who are equally unethical as DeLay so when we finish with him, move on to the next one!

    Somehow the message must be sent that corruption is not going to fly. Indict whomever needs it and clean the place up. Sounds polly-annish I know but the standard has to be higher then "we've never been caught" or "my buddies said it was ok"
     
  13. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1
  14. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    I wonder if these DeLay "bashers" are also Bush "bashers" and Clinton "LOVERS"?
     
  15. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't know. :confused:
     
  16. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,264
    Likes Received:
    4
    Let him have his day in court. If he's guilty, then I'll even call him a weasel. 'till then, we should give him the same benefit of the doubt we give all indictees.

    But I don't expect him to be found guilty.
     
  17. Bunyon

    Bunyon
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    0
    If he is another Tip O'neal, he should have to leave like O'neal did. If not, well I hate politics.
     
  18. Walguy

    Walguy
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2002
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    1
    Actually the judge directed a verdict of Not Guilty so jeopardy was attached and Ms. Hutchinson could not be reindicted on the same frivolous charges. Obviously the judge was familiar with Earle.
     
  19. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, I hear he refused to present his evidence during the trial, and then when the charges were dropped, he found the nearest camera and started presenting his case in front of the cameras, thereby trying her in the court of public opinion instead of a court of law. Apparently, he believes in vigilante justice and not due process.

    Joseph Botwinick
     
  20. Bunyon

    Bunyon
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have not been to impressed with Delay, but I am feeling pretty confident this is a political black bag job.
     

Share This Page

Loading...