Unborn = Unliving

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Aaron, May 5, 2012.

  1. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,666
    Likes Received:
    225
    This was worth a new thread in my estimation.

    I guess the same could asked about health care for the aged. Why do you care so much for the dying, but not those with a long life ahead of them?
     
  2. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Sadly the leftist like Obama and his followers want to kill at both ends of the spectrum: Slaughter the unborn and let the 15 member "death panel" under Obamacare sentence the elderly.
     
  3. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,643
    Likes Received:
    158
    We already have death panels. The current death panels are the reviewers who work for insurance companies and determine if a procedure will or will not be paid for.


     
  4. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    What is the evidence that a collection of undifferentiated cells has a soul? Is the soul external to the body? When does the body receive a soul? Or is a soul part of our DNA?
     
  5. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not to take us off topic...

    But your argument is a good reason to never allow human cloning.

    If human cloning were to become a reality someone could use the same argument that clones don't have souls and consign them to a slave class.

    Now back to our scheduled topic.
     
  6. annsni

    annsni
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,196
    Likes Received:
    374
    I would disagree because you can STILL have the procedure if the doctor so chooses - or if you are able to raise the funds yourself. If my insurance company decided that they would not allow my daughter to have her surgery where she did, we would have mortgaged the house to have it done. It wasn't the insurance company's decision - it was ours. Now, if the doctors all decided that she would not get the surgery, then that would be an other story.

    In countries with socialized medicine, the doctors can choose to not do a procedure based on something like age and you have no choice. An example is my friend's dad who had prostate cancer. He was deemed too old to treat and so they were going to let him die. This was in England. Even paying for it privately, they wouldn't do it. He came here to the states and received immediate care that he paid for - but he was able to get the care. It was HIS choice, not any bureaucracy.
     
  7. saturneptune

    saturneptune
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    0
    Romney, Romney!!! Let's all vote for Romney.
     
  8. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,666
    Likes Received:
    225
    Is there an original thought in your head?
     
  9. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    The most unChristian and disgusting posts I have seen. Ever.
     
  10. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    All well and good if you have resources like a house, money for world travel, etc. Many sick people have nothing.
     
  11. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    Originally Posted by Crabtownboy
    Why do you care so much for the unborn,but not for the living?


    This post is revealing, and it's not flattering.
     
  12. annsni

    annsni
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,196
    Likes Received:
    374
    Which is why being in a church family is so important. I know in our church, we've paid the medical bills of those who do not have insurance for whatever reason and find themselves in a catastrophic situation.
     
  13. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is the insurance company or the government obligated to keep people alive as long as it is technically possible?
     
  14. annsni

    annsni
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,196
    Likes Received:
    374
    No, but my friend's father was a young man, in his 60s with still MANY more years to his life. He would have been dead within the year in England but instead he had 8 more years - enough years to see his grandchildren born - before he had an accident and was killed. The government insurance didn't deem him worthy enough of those 7 extra years.
     
  15. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Glad to see that you have converted.
     
  16. seekingthetruth

    seekingthetruth
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,611
    Likes Received:
    0
    While Romney will probably not do much to stop abortions (mainly for fear of alienating moderate Republicans and independents), I dont see him going against the party that puts him in office by advancing the pro-abortion agenda.

    Obama does indeed have a pro-abortion agenda and pursues it shamelessly.

    Bottom line is this....over the next 4 years either Obama will try to pass more pro-abortion legislation...or Romney will simply do nothing.

    Since these are the only two choices we have i would prefer the "do nothing" candidate.

    John
     
  17. annsni

    annsni
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,196
    Likes Received:
    374
    I agree. Unfortunately we're between a rock and a hard place and at least the rock can be budged a bit. I'd rather vote for someone who is at least not going to make things worse for moral values.
     
  18. HeirofSalvation

    HeirofSalvation
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,962
    Likes Received:
    1
    No, It is not the function nor purpose of either of those two entities to do this...the responsibility lies with US....It lies with those in the Church to help others in the Church. We can delegate authority to Government....you cannot delegate the responsibility.
     
  19. HeirofSalvation

    HeirofSalvation
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,962
    Likes Received:
    1
    The reviewers do no such thing, the contract signed and freely entered into by both signers: the insurance company and the purchaser, determine which procedures will be paid for.
     
  20. Robert Snow

    Robert Snow
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    4,466
    Likes Received:
    0
    You say your church pays the medical bills for members who do not have insurance? What would your church do if a patient needed a heart transplant, but was uninsured? Would your church pay the hundreds of thousands of dollars to help people like these.

    The problem is not that the church will not help, it's that the cost of medical treatment has risen to the point that without insurance, a person is pretty much out of luck if they are not wealthy.
     

Share This Page

Loading...