1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Was Death for Man Only Spiritual in Genesis?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Marcia, Dec 14, 2009.

?
  1. It was spiritual only

    2 vote(s)
    8.3%
  2. It was physical only

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. It was both spiritual and physical

    19 vote(s)
    79.2%
  4. I'm not sure

    3 vote(s)
    12.5%
  5. Other (please explain)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Darrenss1

    Darrenss1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    0
    Childish remarks?? What childish remark?? I am allowed to structure an argument whichever way I see fit, if you don't agree state your reasons why and not carry on about it. :BangHead:

    Yes ad hominems, you have a go at me instead of the point I raised about the interepretation of the word world (I'm assuming).


    Darren
     
  2. Darrenss1

    Darrenss1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's complete rot, get your facts straight. That was an illustration to make the point:
    "That's how some of you are rendering world in Rom 5:12."

    Get over it sport... :tonofbricks:

    By the way the definition of tirade is angry outburst, no such thing did I do. You are obviously reading my posts with a jaded mentality.

    Darren
     
  3. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    Anyone who talks seriously about preaching the gospels to animals [which you were] is either childish or has the mentality of a child. Most children think their pet goes to heaven when it dies.
     
    #43 OldRegular, Dec 17, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 17, 2009
  4. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    You referenced my post and then took off on preaching the Gospel to animals. If you just wanted to comment on Romans 5:12 you should referenced it directly. Furthermore, referencing my post and then saying:
    implies that I have been saying that nonsense.

    If the following is not a tirade than what is?

    Is the above simply routine statement from someone who walks upside down?
     
  5. Darrenss1

    Darrenss1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's the thing, I made no suggestion of preaching the gospel to animals are you that naive?? Where do you get off that I made a "serious" CLAIM??

    Get over it, you read the whole thing wrong for some reason but I forgive you.

    Darren
     
    #45 Darrenss1, Dec 18, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 18, 2009
  6. Darrenss1

    Darrenss1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know what you are on about but obviously you think you have a slam dunk on something, take a chill pill and count to 30 and see if that helps.

    There was no suggestion made by me to preach to animals, read the context, it might help with your confusion.

    May the Lord bless you..... :thumbs:

    Darren
     
Loading...