Was the word homosexuality introduced into the bible later on?

I just watched Larry King and there was this gay bishop and a lesbian pastor and they both argued for homosexuality. This woman claimed that the word homosexuality was later on introduced in the bible and that first of all the word in greek which was used there had a different meaning and was about abusing a younger person and she said that you can trace this back and see that in the beginning the word which was used here was not homosexuality. Is this true?
But even if it is true it doesn't mean homosexuality is okay. What about this here?

Rom 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
Rom 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Can it be clearer?
I don't understand how these people can be so convinced of their opinion. Are they really believing that God thinks being gay is okay or are they willfully ignorant? What I noticed is that these gays seem to be totally convinced that God thinks what they are doing is okay and that God created them this way. The lesbian pastor also said that she has a wonderful relationship with God. Do you think this is true? Is this even possible?
I don't know what to think of these people. Are they only being rebellious or are they really deceived that think they are doing the right thing?

 

So you think that these people are not honestly wanting the truth but they only want to bend the bible to fit into what they want to be true?
I also noticed that these people tried to give the word truth a bad name because they made it look like what the fundamental christians call truth isn't the real truth.

 

Hmmm...
I have a few questions about this issue.
Is a christian who is drinking and not repentant as bad as a homosexual christian who is practicing homosexuality and not repenting?
I think most christians will say that the homosexual christian is worse but is this really true? I mean there are christians which hold on to some sins and which may even be rebellious, but I don't think they directly lose their salvation because of this. Then where's the difference between a christian who drinks and doesn't want to repent and a gay christian who doesn't want to repent? Isn't it the same?
But more christians focus on homosexuality than on drinking. Homosexuality simply seems filthier to us and is less "accepted" than drinking. But does God distinguish between different sins? In the bible there are passages where God names certain sins and to me this seems like he's categorizing sin. If this is true then this seems as if God indeed distinguishes the severity of different sins.

Gal 5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

Does this mean that God sees all these sins here as equal in their severity?
Then what about revellings? Does this mean that christians which are obese and like to eat a lot are as bad as murderers?
How many sermons are there about revellings and how many sermons are there about homosexuality?

What I also ask myself is wether christians which claim that there is no such thing as a homosexual are right. Some claim that it's simply a choice. I don't think this makes much sense. If it's a choice then why should anybody choice to be gay? There are gays which already behave strange as children and which say that already as children they knew they were gay and many gays also suffer from this. How does this fit together with the choice-theory?
Also if it was a choice then this would basically mean that all of us once had to make a choice wether we want to be gay or not. I don't think I was ever tempted to become gay. This simply makes no sense and when I imagine being a gay who suffers from being gay and then I hear a christian who is not gay and doesn't have a clue how a gay feels say that being gay is a choice then it would really anger me. Maybe this is the reason why many gays are angry at christians because many christians come off pretty arrogant by saying that it's a choice. What if it's not a choice? Isn't this the same as saying having diabetes is a choice? I bet this would anger a lot of people which have diabetes.
I don't really dig this choice stuff. I would rather assume that being gay could also be genetic. I have seen some gays which had this typical gay voice and also looked gay. I don't think that they made this gay voice on purpose it was simply how they talked.

 

I mean being an alcoholic. Is being an alcoholic better than being gay?

 

Cool.

But I don't understand why many christians are so totally focused on proving that being gay is a choice. Doesn't reality prove them wrong? If it is a choice then why are there gays which suffer from it or which even marry because they hope that everything will work out once they're married? I have seen and heard this many times from gays that they tried to "heal" themselves but it simply didn't work. I think it's somehow really strange when christians simply insist on homosexuality being a choice. This is like saying being heterosexual is a choice. I never choose to be heterosexual I simply am heterosexual. But this also creates problems because if there are in fact gays which are born this way or which started being gay at an early age then what does this imply? Does this mean that God won't hold them accountable for it or that he only holds them accountable if they don't want to be cured from it?

 

Sure, this IS a choice. But having homosexual feelings is not a choice.
According to your logic a person which has pedophile feelings but does not act upon them is as normal as a person which doesn't have these feelings but there is clearly a difference or would you say that a person which struggles with pedophile feelings and doesn't act upon them is normal? I don't think that such a person is normal.

 

But you have to admit that not all people are the same. If ALL people had homosexual fantasies and lusts then you could say that but the normal person doesn't even have such thoughts. Here is already a difference between a homosexual and a normal person + another major difference, which is the fact that a homosexual isn't attracted to women because this would make him bisexual. Heterosexual christians which struggle with lust can simply marry and this way they at least get what they want, homosexuals cannot simply marry. For them there is no "hope". This is a huge difference. Imagine a heterosexual who desires women but knows that he is never allowed to marry. Such a person would also get problems, just look at what many priests do with children. This is a result of not being allowed to have sex.

@ Joseph

The link doesn't work. Do you need real player to open it? I have real player but I noticed before that it doesn't work and I cannot listen to real player stuff. This is strange..

 

I have Media Player 10 but when I click on the link nothing happens.