One thing that always bothered me growing up around King James Only doctrine was why the NKJ was not accepted as valid. It is based on the same texts as the KJV. It has all those missing places that the others don't like 1 John 5:7 etc. I have even seen people say that since "and these Three are One" is left out of all other versions then that makes the KJV the right version. But of course it is not left out of the NKJ. All of these arguments simply do not hold up across the board. One like Virginia Mollencott. Just what did she have to do with the ESV or the NKJ? I have never once seen a promotion of the KJV as the only valid version that would be honest enough to show you where some modern did not differ from the KJV. The selective spinning of the facts is almost comical. It would be if it was not deceiving people. distracting people from the gospel and splitting churches.