1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What Baptist Confession do You Rank as the Best?

Discussion in '2000-02 Archive' started by Kiffin, Mar 7, 2002.

?

What Baptist Confession do You Rank as the Best?

  1. ABSTRACTS OF PRINCIPLES 1859

    9 vote(s)
    18.8%

  2. BAPTIST FAITH AND MESSAGE 1925, 1963

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  3. DOCTRINAL CONFESSION OF THE AMERICAN BAPTIST ASSOCIATION

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  4. JOHN SMYTH’S SHORT CONFESSION OF FAITH 1609

    4 vote(s)
    8.3%

  5. LONDON BAPTIST CONFESSION 1644

    13 vote(s)
    27.1%

  6. LONDON BAPTIST CONFESSION 1689

    1 vote(s)
    2.1%

  7. MIDLAND BAPTIST CONFESSION 1655

    9 vote(s)
    18.8%

  8. NEW HAMPSHIRE BAPTIST CONFESSION 1833

    4 vote(s)
    8.3%

  9. BAPTIST FAITH AND MESSAGE 2000

    8 vote(s)
    16.7%

  10. OTHER

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Top Posters
Page 1 of 2
  1. Kiffin

    Kiffin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,191
    Likes Received:
    0
    What Baptist Confession do You Rank as the Best?
     
    #1 Kiffin, Mar 7, 2002
  2. DocCas

    DocCas New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    1
    I voted for the New Hampshire Confession of 1833, but have reservations regarding articles XII and XV. The only confession of faith that I totally agree with is the one I wrote for myself. [​IMG]

    I notice you voted for the Midland Confession. My problem with the Midland confession is not what it says, but what it doesn't say. [​IMG]
     
    #2 DocCas, Mar 7, 2002
  3. David Cooke Jr

    David Cooke Jr New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    0
    I voted "liberal/moderate", but as a moderate I would have liked to have these two distinct categories listed separately (at least for accuracy's sake). Most people outside Baptist life consider me moderate to conservative. Most Baptists I know think I'm moderate, although a few consider me liberal.
     
    #3 David Cooke Jr, Mar 7, 2002
  4. Bro. John Willis

    Bro. John Willis New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think that Thomas may be right. All of these confessions have points that cause me/us (our church) some concern. That is the reason why ours is the only one that we could totally agree with.
    Maybe, we(Baptists)need to concentrate more on the really hot and pertinent issues for today and write confessions that clarify those points and just copy the points that are absolutely clear for other dated sources. This would show continuity with the past and apt knowledge with relevancy of the present.
    Can somebody help me with this?
    Your brother
    John
     
    #4 Bro. John Willis, Mar 7, 2002
  5. Kiffin

    Kiffin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,191
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dr. C,

    You said,
    I would be curious what that would be? The Midland's strength and weakness is that it is brief and may not be as comprehensive as it should be. I would agree with you on that. [​IMG]

    The 1689 London I believe is the most comprehensive and I am in basic agreement with it but it is so wordy I believe that many would not read it through. I like the Midland because it is brief and to the point and I am in complete agreement with it but that does not mean that an appendix could be added if a local church chose it as their confession to clarify contemporary concerns.

    David Cooke, Jr,
    Your point is well taken.

    Bro. John Willis,

    Good point though I think a confession could have a Comprehensive doctrinal statements and then have an appendix that deals with contemporary issues or heresises. I think that is the problem with all the various manifestations of the Baptist Faith and Message. Why not just stick with the New Hampshire (which it is a revision of) and add contemporary issues in an appendix.

    I would say this, that even the best confession has strengths and weaknesses. That's why the Bible in the end is the final authority.
     
    #5 Kiffin, Mar 7, 2002
  6. DocCas

    DocCas New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    1
    Kiffin, my concern with the Midland is that it does not clarify the identity of Christ's New Testament churches. The Philadelphia starts right off in article 1 with the "catholic or universal church." New Hamshire corrects this in Article XIII by identifying the church of Jesus Christ as a visible congregation of baptized believers. The Midland makes no statement at all concerning the nature and identity of the Lord's churches. [​IMG]
     
    #6 DocCas, Mar 7, 2002
  7. Kiffin

    Kiffin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,191
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dr. C,

    The Midland states,
    The New Hampshire states,
    I think the New Hampshire strongly emphasizes the local church though I would say the Midland also does strongly (and is a favorite of Primitive Baptists)though I know Landmarkers prefer the New Hampshire definition. I don't have a problem with the Philadelphia or London's definition either I just wish it was not the primary definition.
     
    #7 Kiffin, Mar 7, 2002
  8. Baptistas

    Baptistas <img src=/2836.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2002
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mine creed here was not specified. I from Russia. Myself I attribute to Arminian Baptists. Others creeds Baptists are not known for me yet.
     
    #8 Baptistas, Mar 11, 2002
  9. Doc Yankum

    Doc Yankum New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thomas, can you tell us your reservations concerning no. Xll and XV? I am learning much from you bible scholars.
     
    #9 Doc Yankum, Mar 16, 2002
  10. DocCas

    DocCas New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have a problem with Article XII due to the statement "and to restore them through a Mediator to unfeigned obedience to the holy Law, is one great end of the Gospel, and of the means of grace connected with the establishment of the visible Church." I am not certain what they mean by "the Law of God." They say it is His "eternal and unchangeable rule of moral government." I see two distinct laws in the bible, the OT Law (603 Mitzvot (Commandments) and 10 Devarim (words) inscribed on the tablets), and the NT law, or "the Law of Christ." Although I do not entirely embrace New Covenent theology, as I still tend to be an historic premillenialist and a very mild dispensationalist, I do agree the OT Law is no more, and the NT law is ours in Christ.

    Article XV deals with what they call "the Christian Sabbath." They say it is the first day of the week, or Lord's Day and it is to be kept sacred to religious purposes. I could not disagree more! Christ is our Sabbath. We entered into our sabbath rest when we were saved. We rest in Him. One day is just as another. [​IMG]
     
    #10 DocCas, Mar 16, 2002
  11. tyndale1946

    tyndale1946 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    11,017
    Likes Received:
    2,408
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm a Primitive Baptist and am not really sure weather it is the London Baptist Confessional of 1644 or 1689 as its been awhile since I've read either. What would be of benefit to all that are interested is a thread that would have the web sites to all those articles mentioned. I've posted our Articles of Faith here on another post... I have an idea for Baptist History... Brother Glen :D
     
    #11 tyndale1946, Mar 16, 2002
  12. Baptistas

    Baptistas <img src=/2836.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2002
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    0
    #12 Baptistas, Mar 18, 2002
  13. American Citizen

    American Citizen New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2001
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello all. I think the best theolgical document is the 2nd London / Philadelphia / Charleston Confession. I think every age needs to address the issues of its day. What was important in the past may not be an issue today. What is important today may not have been an issue in the past.
     
    #13 American Citizen, Apr 2, 2002
  14. Chris Temple

    Chris Temple New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Undoubtedly, the 1689LBCF is the best :D
     
    #14 Chris Temple, Apr 3, 2002
  15. JAMES2

    JAMES2 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2001
    Messages:
    633
    Likes Received:
    0
    #15 JAMES2, Apr 4, 2002
  16. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is because of this that I have come to see Systematic Theology as an evolutionary kind of discipline. Issues pertaining to the Person of Christ (Christology) were settled first. Then, as we come into the Reformation period issues concerning Soteriology and Ecclesiology were delved into and systematized. As we came up to the turn of the last century (c.1900), Bibliology became the issue that needed some thought and exposition. For the last hundred years or so, Separation or Practical Ecclesiology has been the issue on the front burner. Mind you, I use the word evolutionary in a fairly strict sense. E.g. the Volkswagen "Beetle" continusly evolved from 1930s through the 1970s. In the case of SysThe, the doctrines are there in God's Word but some times it takes man a liitle while to get his mind around them (if he ever does).

    We ran into a problem c.1949. Issues arose that had not been previously dealt with by the brethren. Some reacted in line with previously held principles. Many took the stand that since these were not "historic" issues no action should be taken.
     
    #16 Squire Robertsson, Apr 4, 2002
  17. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Anyone familiar with the Baptist version of the Shorter Catechism?

    Anyone know of a modern-language form of the LBC 1689?
     
    #17 TomVols, Apr 4, 2002
  18. Jonathan

    Jonathan Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Our church still publishes copies of Spurgeon's Baptist Catechism (which really the Shorter Catechism with two questions added).

    John Piper has prepared a Baptist Catechism which is also based on Westminster. You can find it at Desiring God Ministries
     
    #18 Jonathan, Apr 4, 2002
  19. jmbertrand

    jmbertrand Guest

    I'm not sure where I got it, but there is a modern language version of the LBC 1689 that's titled "A Faith to Confess."

    Mark
     
    #19 jmbertrand, Apr 4, 2002
  20. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you could check on that for me, I'd appreciate it. I'd love to get hold of a copy.
     
    #20 TomVols, Apr 4, 2002
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 1 of 2
Loading...