This one ought to cause a few interesting comments. Isn't it a little bit odd that the same people who will not accept manuscripts that come out of Alexandria because they feel the country is corrupt turn around and believe in the a perfect word-for-word translation that came from a country with a history of the Catholic Church? (one of the same claims as Alexandrian documents being found under the care of Catholics) In England Henry the eight started the Anglican church based on Catholic beliefs to divorce his wife. The church maintained most of the beliefs. Why would a person reject a manuscript from Alexandria claiming it was an evil city, when England was persecuting and killing Puritans that believed much like the Baptists? They will accept a translation from a country much like Alexandria. Isn't this a double standard? NOTE: I am NOT saying there is anything wrong with the King James Version. But the contradiction of those who reject the Alexandrian documents needs to be addressed. This is NOT referring to Textus Receptus preferred. This is referring to level 4 and 5 KJVo according to Dr. Bob's definitions.