1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What is settled in Heaven? Poll

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Su Wei, Jul 27, 2006.

?
  1. The original manuscripts, every jot and tittle

    10 vote(s)
    55.6%
  2. Only the OT law

    1 vote(s)
    5.6%
  3. God's thoughts

    3 vote(s)
    16.7%
  4. In the NT, the TR

    1 vote(s)
    5.6%
  5. In the NT, the Byzantine text type

    1 vote(s)
    5.6%
  6. In the NT, the Alexandrian text type

    1 vote(s)
    5.6%
  7. The KJV

    1 vote(s)
    5.6%
  8. Some other translation

    1 vote(s)
    5.6%
  9. None of the above

    6 vote(s)
    33.3%
  10. All of the above

    2 vote(s)
    11.1%
Multiple votes are allowed.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Su Wei: //I'm a "lay" believer. Don't hoodwink me...//

    I'm a 'lay' believer. I shot straight from the hip. :wavey:

    Su Wei: //And if we were to follow your line of argument, who (and what were their savlation testimonies) were the witnesses who affirmed the NIV ?//

    That isn't following my 'line of argument'.
    My like of argument is that EARLY GREEK NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES are witnesses.
    More than one witness is required.

    If I today am to have more than one witness to the Written Word of God
    in English, I must use more than one English Translation.

    The original KJV, the KJV1611 Edition (an many other KJVs, I might add)
    had footnotes that show the Received Text contained MULTIPLE WITNESSES.
     
    #21 Ed Edwards, Jul 28, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 28, 2006
  2. Su Wei

    Su Wei Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,667
    Likes Received:
    0
    Faith:
    Baptist
    hmmmnn... straight from the hip? and that would mean....?
    quick draw McGraw? :laugh:

    perhaps you could help answer my pervious question??
     
  3. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    My revision of my previous post crossed your request.
     
  4. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    2Co 13:1 (KJV1611 Edition):
    This is the third time I am comming to you: in the mouth of two
    or three witnesses shal euery word be established.

    Ed Edwards: //IMHO this Command of the LORD is especially true concerning
    the Bible, God's Holy Written Word (Rhema). Yes, here 'word'
    is translated from the Greek (rhema), so it is talking about
    Bible, God's Holy Written Word.//

    I tell it like it is, really & truly. (i'm a straight shooter)

    Su Wei: //that would be taking 2cor 13:1 out of context. This verse is not about deciding what is God breathed word that is to be accepted as Holy Scripture!!!//

    I respectfully disagree with you. I've exactly and truly
    explained what this verse says.

    However, I am very willing to relate how some will
    try to trick the 'lay' believer.

    1. There are multiple KJV witnesses.
    KJV is properly said KJVs.
    I have the following in paper:
    A. KJV1611 Edition (with translator footnotes)
    B. KJV1769 Edition
    C. KJV1873 Edition (with translator footnotes)

    2. There are multiple Received Text witnesses.
    In other words, the TR is plural.

    3. The Translator Footnotes are NOT causers of doubt
    but document the Truth. There are multiple original
    language witness to Bible truths - in fact, over 5,000
    witnesses from the first Millinnium of the Church Age alone.

    4. Etc.
     
  5. Su Wei

    Su Wei Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,667
    Likes Received:
    0
    Faith:
    Baptist
    you are telling me that 2cor13:1 is talking about how the cannon of scripture is decided? In that context of 2 cor 12, 13?
     
  6. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,356
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Wiggle away, Brother! :laugh: :thumbs:
     
  7. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Su Wei: //you are telling me that 2cor13:1 is talking about
    how the cannon of scripture is decided?//

    No. on several levels:

    1. according to dictionary.com:
    CANNON = 1. A large mounted weapon that fires heavy
    projectiles. Cannon include guns, howitzers, and mortars
    let us talk about:
    CANON - 4 The books of the Bible officially accepted
    as Holy Scripture.

    2. The current canon of scripture was decided
    at the Church Council in 325AD in Nice (also known as
    the Nicean Church Council).

    3. What I'm talking about:
    it is good when you
    study the scripture to use MULITPLE VERSIONS (witnesses).
    The Holy Spirit can reveal more to you than is contained in
    either one of the two.

    Witness #1:
    2 Cor 12:19B (KJV1611 Editon):
    ... wee speake before God in Christ:
    wee doe all things, dearely beloued, for your edifying.

    Witness #2:
    2 Cor 12:19B (HCSB = Christian Standard Bible /Holman, 2003/ ):
    No, in the sight of God we are speaking in Christ,
    and everything, dear friends, is for building you up.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...