Which are acceptable baptisms?

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by SaggyWoman, Sep 7, 2008.

?

Which baptisms are acceptable baptisms?

  1. The Baptist Baptism

    22 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. The Catholic baptism

    3 vote(s)
    13.6%
  3. The Presbyterian baptism

    4 vote(s)
    18.2%
  4. The Methodist baptism

    4 vote(s)
    18.2%
  5. The Church of Christ baptism

    6 vote(s)
    27.3%
  6. The Pentecostal Holiness baptism

    6 vote(s)
    27.3%
  7. Mormon Baptism

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. Church of God Baptism

    4 vote(s)
    18.2%
  9. AME baptism

    2 vote(s)
    9.1%
  10. Lutheran Baptism

    4 vote(s)
    18.2%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. SaggyWoman

    SaggyWoman
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2000
    Messages:
    17,933
    Likes Received:
    8
    Your thoughts?
     
  2. exscentric

    exscentric
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,253
    Likes Received:
    16
    How about "none of the above?" :laugh:
     
  3. Jim1999

    Jim1999
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    0
    Any immersion in water that is done in obedience to the Lord's command.

    Given that the man converted on the highway did not have an audience at his baptism, they key is "obedience" and not as a "witness".

    The act of baptism can be by immersion in the Church of England and of believers. This baptism is not the same as their covenant baptism of infants. If the candidate is being immersed for the right reason, why can't it be acceptable.

    None of us are perfect in theology when were first saved and prolly when we were baptiszed. Why would we demand perfect understanding of theology of a candidate?

    I do think some organizations baptize prematurely, but that is another discussion.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  4. Gwyneth

    Gwyneth
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/gwyneth.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,137
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Any immersion in water that is done in obedience to the Lord's command."
    I agree Jim
     
  5. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    0
    Scriptural baptism meets the following criteria:
    \
    The right subject. A believer

    The right design. To picture the gospel, and to demonstrate outwardly what has happened inwardly--death to sin, rising to a new life in Christ.

    The right mode. Immersion.

    And the most controversial, the right authority. This is where most of us have different opinions. The right authority is a Baptist church of like faith and order, or a non-denominational church of like faith and order. Getting any of the first three criteria disqualifies an organization from calling itself a New Testament church.

    Jesus walked a long way to submit to baptism by the right authority--John the Baptist.
     
  6. EdSutton

    EdSutton
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    They are all 'acceptable' -
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >


    Well, that is, acceptable enough to start a BIG argument over, anyway. :D [​IMG][​IMG]

    Ed
     
  7. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not all who baptize by immersion have an understanding about salvation and that baptism is for believers only. Some do not teach salvation, or that baptism id for salvation or baptism completes salvation. These baptisms can not be accepted as they are foreign to the NT.
     
  8. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    what he said
     
  9. SaggyWoman

    SaggyWoman
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2000
    Messages:
    17,933
    Likes Received:
    8
    :laugh:

    hahaha!!
     
  10. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    27
    wow. infant baptism got a positive vote...wow do we not understand our baptist distinctives.

    RB
     
  11. Jim1999

    Jim1999
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    0
    So, Jesus was baptized by a Jew to demonstrate His conversion!!!!!

    Baptism is a step of obedience. Jesus was absolutely obedient to the Father.

    As to te one who baptizes, John Smythe is accepted by many as the one who started the modern Baptist Church...he poured water on his own head as there was no one else about to baptize him in Holland. I am not sure, historically, that all future members of the early English Baptist churches were immersed. In fact, John Smythe preferred the Mennonite Brethren church.

    Personally, I always taught that baptism was a step of obedience to the Lord....be saved and be baptized. It was an outward symbol of an inward grace. It is always total immersion in water. The doer is irrelevant. He/she is not the subject of baptism. The person being baptized is.

    I was baptized in a Plymouth Brethren Gospel Hall. The Baptist Union had no difficulty accepting my baptism prior to ordination.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  12. Marcia

    Marcia
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, I was VERY surprised to see that, too!

    I voted only for Baptist because the others I know of were all infant baptism, or the CoC false baptism/salvation doctrine, or the Pentecostal which believes you must speak in tongues and/or have a 2nd infilling of the HS, and of course the Mormon one is totally unacceptable since they not Christian at all.

    I don't know enough about the AME to say.

    The Church of God - depends on which Church of God you mean. There are 2 major ones and a whole lot of other Churches of God.
     
  13. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    9,633
    Likes Received:
    310
    I marked off anybody who doesn't accept sprinkling, pouring, or anointing (not to mention performs the "rite" on infants) as my answers.
     
  14. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    0
    I doubt if you really mean that it's okay to accept a baptism by a Mormon, Jehovah's Witness, or the town drunk.
     
  15. MNJacob

    MNJacob
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    2
    For church membership, I would accept believer's baptism by immersion in a Trinitarian format, period.

    That would not necessarily preclude any of those listed except the Mormon baptism.

    I believe that baptism by professing believers may be an option in most of the choices.
     
  16. I Am Blessed 24

    I Am Blessed 24
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    44,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    I checked Baptist only and I dare say that most of the churches listed would not accept our Baptism if we were to join their church.

    I too am surprised that in a Baptist Only forum, 3 people voted for the Catholic Baptism to be accepted. Maybe they just snuck in here and voted?
     
  17. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    What about those who do not require salvation before baptism, or who teach baptism is salvation, or that baptism completes salvation?
    these are not biblibal salvations and baptisms, and are all to be rejected by a NT church.
     
  18. Brandon C. Jones

    Brandon C. Jones
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    598
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with MNJacob, except I would accept believer baptisms that are not done by immersion as irregular but valid. There are some Anabaptists who only baptize by immersion in living water, so in the winter when none is accessible they practice baptism by pouring (a practice as old as the time of the Didache). I see no need to consider such a baptism invalid. I think the use of baptistries is irregular too, but I don't consider baptisms performed in them to be invalid either.

    The key is that it is believer baptism in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. This would exclude Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons.

    I must not be a proper NT Christian because I think there's a good case from the NT itself that baptism is the normative way of confessing faith in Jesus Christ and being joined to his body. It's not the only way as there are exceptions, but it is the normative way. I don't have a problem with branches of Christianity that take this teaching from the NT more seriously than most Baptists today do and include believer baptism as part of the normative conversion process. In fact, I think many of our Baptist forefathers believed this to be the case.
     
    #18 Brandon C. Jones, Sep 8, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 8, 2008
  19. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    baptism not done by immersion is not a biblical baptism, and can not be called so.
    It should never be accepted unless the person is on death bed, is saved and requestes baptism. But for the average person who is not currently dying and is to go onliving, nothing but immersion is acceptable.
    Am I right, you don't think baptism is for believers only, or that a person does not need to be a confessing believer to be baptiszed.
    Oh boy.
     
  20. Brandon C. Jones

    Brandon C. Jones
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    598
    Likes Received:
    0
    DonnA, I'm not sure how you could infer either from my post. There are only two things I would die for regarding baptism. First, that it is believer baptism. Second, that it is done in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

    I believe that immersion in living water is the best way, but I recognize that there are many irregular ways out there (sometimes for good reason, sometimes for convenience, and sometimes for other reasons) and I see no need to make them invalid because they are irregular.

    As for what's "biblical" (a useless word on this board), one could make the case that the practice of making baptism only a naked symbol of obedience doesn't match up very well with what Scripture says about baptism.
     

Share This Page

Loading...