who really was Dean Burgon?

Discussion in '2000-02 Archive' started by Forever settled in heaven, Mar 2, 2002.

  1. Forever settled in heaven

    Forever settled in heaven
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    altho he's claimed by some to be a father of KJBOism, he really sounds sane in the quote below:

    http://members.aol.com/pilgrimpub/quotesbt.htm

    JOHN WILLIAM BURGON

    Once for all, we request it may be clearly understood that we do not, by any means, claim perfection for the Received Text. We entertain no extravagant notions on this subject. Again and again we shall have occasion to point out that the Textus Receptus needs correction. [The Revision Revised(1883), pg. 21, as quoted in Theodore Letis' The Revival of the Ecclesiastical Text pg. 44]

    wow, even the pure text may not be perfect and needs correction! i wonder if today's "Dean Burgon Society" subscribes to that.
     
  2. Chris Temple

    Chris Temple
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Burgon was a scholar of the highest magnitiude, and many od his criticisms of the W_H text theory have never been refuted (despite what Dan Wallace says :rolleyes: )

    He was not KJVO, and believed, as your post says, that the TR needed correction.
     
  3. DocCas

    DocCas
    Expand Collapse
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    And his associate, F.H.A. Scrivener, did those corrections and published his work in 1894, after Burgon's death. However, Scrivener left some things unchanged with Burgon had earlier objected too, preseumably on the basis of evidence he uncovered. As Burgon was already dead, we have no way of telling if the evidence Scrivener presented would have satisfied Burgon. But he was undoutedly the finest textual scholar in the world of his day.
     
  4. Chris Temple

    Chris Temple
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    2,841
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dr. C:

    Are there any English versions based upon Scrivener's text, and if not, why not?
     
  5. DocCas

    DocCas
    Expand Collapse
    Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2000
    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    All of Jay Green's work is based on the Scrivener text, and the NKJV also follows Scrivener, for the most part. I am not sure about the 21st Century KJV and the Bible for the Third Millenium, but they also seem to follow Scrivener. It is Scrivener's text which is presently published by the Trinitarian Bible Society under the name "Textus Receptus." [​IMG]
     
  6. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,137
    Likes Received:
    320
    John Burgon (Dean of Chichester)in the 1880's was also a devoted churchman of the Anglican Church.

    As such he would have had to (officially anyway) endorse infant baptism and "once saved not necessarily always saved".

    HankD

    [ March 04, 2002, 07:32 PM: Message edited by: HankD ]
     
  7. Mike McK

    Mike McK
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    6,630
    Likes Received:
    0
    [ March 04, 2002, 10:39 PM: Message edited by: Smoke_Eater ]
     
  8. Mike McK

    Mike McK
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    6,630
    Likes Received:
    0
    [ March 04, 2002, 10:40 PM: Message edited by: Smoke_Eater ]
     

Share This Page

Loading...