1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why do protestant groups insist on saving people that don’t need saving…?

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by Jacob Dahlen, Apr 10, 2006.

  1. Linda64

    Linda64 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    2,051
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes I did know that. Amen--great post! [​IMG] Not alot of people do know that--even those who call themselves Baptists. I recently found out (about a year ago) when I was doing some study on Baptist history. Thank you dcorbett for posting that--even though I am finding it a little late.
     
  2. Chemnitz

    Chemnitz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    2,485
    Likes Received:
    2
    Why are you thanking somebody for posting something that is false. Luther didn't kill anybody nor did he advocate killing people. Not to mention the fact that he used the TR for the NT portion of the German Translation.
     
  3. Eliyahu

    Eliyahu Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,957
    Likes Received:
    16
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Matt,
    Here I continue the way of proving and Onus Probandi.

    1. Case of Jesus
    Jews brought the false witnesses and they said Jesus said " I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days"
    Another witness say "we found this fellow perverting the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar (Luke 23:2)
    What if we didn't have the New Testament but had only the witnesses by the High Priest and his fellow witnesses? Could we judge fairly about Jesus?

    2. Case of Nestorius.

    Nestorius was condemned as Heretic, denying Theotokos. RC often claimed that he insisted 2 persons lived in Jesus Christ. Now the documents discovered in 1895 reveals quite differently from what was thought to be Nestorian belief.

    Look at this:

    http://moses.creighton.edu/okeefe/THL531/projects02/Christolgy5thC/Introduction_files/Nestorius.htm

    http://mb-soft.com/believe/txc/nestoria.htm

    3. Conclusion
    One can hardly evaluate and judge someone or some groups belief without their own writings.
    If Albigenes were so harmful that they had to be masacred and killed, and their properties had to be confiscated, then there must have been any literatures or writings. Why didn't RC preserve them and reveal their own writings?
    It is absolutely because Albi was right but RC was heretic! Therefore they didn't want to reveal the truth.
    This is why Gamaliel prohibited the people from punishing or killing the disciples and said
    " But if it be of God,ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God" ( Acts 5:39)
    God doesn't force any one believe His truth.
    Jesus prohibited Swearing, but you notice RC was forcing the people swear.
    If anyone committed any civil offense such as murder or adultery, then they deserve the punishment. Otherwise, they should have been left free. RC was not confident with their own belief and teachings for themselves because they knew that they themselves were wicked and tricky, forging the false theories, full of Idolatry, disobeying the Words of God.
    If they were faithful with the Words of God, they would have not killed so many Albi's.
     
Loading...