Just from reading some works by Dr. James Sightler (son of Dr. Harold B. Sightler), Gail Riplinger, David Cloud, William P. Grady, etc. textual criticism (lower of course) seems to be wrong, rationalistic, etc. unless they use it? I find this alarming indeed! Anyone have any thoughts on this? If you don't follow textual criticism or study it, why even refer to patristic quotations, the papyri, et al. . .at all!