Why such church buildings?

Having a wild stab at this LandonL but the building of ornate churches was for the glory and honour to God. There were probably ideas of oneupmanship by different cities etc., but at the beginning it was to honour and glorify the Lord and to provide a fitting venue for the congregation of the faithful for such a purpose.

Briony

 

1)For the glory of God
2)God is still in the Church ("Where ever two or more are gathered")
3)Some Churches believe Jesus is also physically present in the Eucharistic elements.

Your scriptural support will be those of tradition.

 

God isn't present at your Church?


LaRae

 

God gave specific instructions for the building of the Temple and it was VERY ornate and expensive.

We have a large church that I would not call ornate, but it needs to be the size it is to contain our members and visitors. We use it everyday (it includes our Christian School).

There is always some type of ministry going on there...soul winning, descipling, Reformer's Unanimous, Crisis Pregnancy counseling, Pastoral counceling, etc.

Busy, busy, busy! PTL!

Blessings,
§ue

 

Which is sad. Most Parishes that I know of are open during the day for visitors, some Reformed churches sanctuary's are. Some Catholic churches also have "perpetual adoration" of which you can go anytime, 24/7

 

I'm not sure that anyone disagrees with you there.

 

Let's look at that concept a little closer. "A church is a group of believers. Where they meet is truly unimportant."
I agree with it. And it wasn't until about 250 years after the Apostolic Age that people began to build what we now call "church buildings," that is, buildings exclusively built for the gathering of the believers. Before believers primarily met in people's houses, or out in the open, or in places like the catacombs of Rome during times of persecution--just wherever they could.

I believe that nowadays the great cathedral-type buildings that are built and are often in use just one or two days of the week are a colossal waste of the Lord's money. A much more simple building can be built and serve the same function (the teaching and preaching of God's Word), and the rest of the money going to missions to reach the lost. The last command that Jesus gave before He left this earth was the Great Commission; it had nothing to do with building cathedrals, or church buildings of any type for that matter. In three missionary journeys it is said that Paul established over one hundred congregations, not buildings. We need to have the right priorities.
DHK

 

Was the oil that anointed the Lord's head a colossal waste of money? Judas thought so.

 

I agree with Dr. Bob and DHK. If you're not going to use it for anything except preaching for an hour 2 days a week, then it is a terrific waste of money.

Tam

 

Why the heck do we even bother with building anything to God's glory. I think from this point on we should all meet on grassy hillsides.

 

I don't believe those colossal buildings are to God's glory at all. Where I went to school one of the professors started a church. Eventually a church building was built to accomodate the needs of the congregation. It was built as a house where the pastor could live upstairs and the congregation could meet downstairs. It was also built so that when the congregation grew larger an addition could be easily built as an add-on. Now the building is larger. The upstairs is used as a Sunday School, and a separate house has been built for the pastor.

I have also seen cathedrals that are about to go bankrupt because their membership has dwindled so much that they are no longer able to pay the soaring heating and electricity costs--again a colossal waste of money.

We are stewards of God's money. It is wasteful to build huge buildings that cost exorbitant prices, and use up God's money that could go to misssions, especially in third world countries where the gospel has never been preached.
DHK

 

That's the problem- the membership has dwindled. If the membership dwindles on the piece of property on the church your professor built they may end up having to sell because of the cost.

I know of a fairly fundamental church near downtown here in GR that recently went under and had to sell the property. Waste of money? Nah. Just sad that folks became lukewarm and stopped attending or giving.

I really have a hard time seeing art and anything truly done for the glory of God as a waste of money. If it is to the neglect of the Church, then yes, that is not good stewardship.

 

I doubt that will happen, but for the sake of argument suppose it did. The building is so built that it has a lot of flexibility. It could be easily sold as a large house. It is in a rural area on a large acreage. As is the policy with other fundamental Baptist churches that I know of, the proceeds of such would probably be divided up among the supporting missionaries. Thus there would be no wastage of money, and no greedy profits made by any of the members.

Sure it is sad when it happens. It happens a lot. The devil works overtime in this wicked world. I know of a fundamental church in Delaware that closed down for some of the same kind of reasons. Again the proceeds went to misssions, the result of which was a tremendous boon to the works that they were supporting.

Unfortunately it is not always so.
The Baptist church in England that William Carey used to be a member of, is now a mosque.
There is a Baptist Church in Calgary that closed down many years ago, and was taken over by a Karate club.

The policy that I know of most Independent Baptist churches is that the proceeds of a dissolving church be dispersed among the supporting missionaries.

On the otherhand when I see Catholic Cathedrals closing it becomes a completely different story. I heard of one that was turned into a pub. Another was turned into condominiums--stained glass windows and all. I heard on the news that some of the larger Cathedrals in eastern Canada, cannot be maintained any longer because of dwindling congregations. Their old brick structures and poor heating systems have sent heating costs soaring through the roof. Some of them have been taken over by the government and declared as "historical sites." It is a pity when our government has to subsidize the Roman Catholic pagan buildings with all of its idols and adornments. The Catholic Church itself is one of the richest organizations on earth. If it wanted to, it could save those buildings with its own funds and assets.

Suppose one of those buildings went bankrupt and had to be sold as you suggested at the beginning. Now what is the scenario? All proceeds would go right back into the purse of the RCC. Is this to the glory of God? No, not at all.

"Where two or three are gathered there am I in the midst of them."

Paul, writing to the church of Rome, sends his greetings to Aquilla and Priscilla, and the church that is in their home.
It was a church--in their home--in Rome--but definitely not in the Vatican Square.

Maybe the art is truly done for man's glory and not God's.
DHK

 

I think that if a congregation wants to build a beautiful building to worship God in, great. If they don't, that's fine, too. There are some truly beautiful church buildings that reflect God's beauty through the talent of the archeticts and building craftsmen (whose talent should not be belittled). Likewise, there are many perfectly respectful small church buidings as well.

What concerns me is when a Christians have an automatic negative reaction to large and/or ornate buildings. Attitudes like that are more a result of one person's envy rather than another person's boastfulness. Calling someone on boastfulness is often easy. Calling someone on envy is more difficult, because it's so much more common and permissible.

 

P-R-I-D-E- There you have it. The big piles of rocks some denominations call churches arent really for God but to give themselves this super pious mystical feeling of awe. Did you ever notice how people whisper when they are in some of these giant cathedrals? We musnt wake God up now.

 

Ps104_33, likewise, as per my previous post, pointing out someone else's "pride" is often the result of envy.

That's E-N-V-Y. There you have it. The folks in some denominations that complain about another denomination's "pile of rocks" don't do it for GOd, but to assuage their own feelings of jealousy. Did you ever notice how people in some churches whisper about the folks in the giant cathedrals? We musnt wake partake in rumor or gossip now.