Another question which keeps me busy. I listened to a sermon about Benny Hinn today. The pastor talked about his heresies. He said that Benny Hinn said that without the holy spirit Jesus would have sinned, he wouldn't have had any chance. What do you think about this? I mean Jesus had the holy spirit in him. Actually it's totally hypothetical to think about what would have happened if Jesus had not had the holy spirit. Isn't this silly? This is like asking: What happens if The Father and the Holy Spirit argue and they separate themselves? What do you think about this? And do you think that Jesus needed an extra anointing which he got after being baptized for his service? Did Jesus need to be anointed to do all those miracles or why did this happen after he was baptized? The preacher also said Jesus was incapable of sinning, do you agree with this? But if he was incapable of sinning why should Satan even have tempted him if Satan knew that Jesus cannot even sin? I'm not sure if Jesus was incapable of sinning, what do you think? Somehow this is really annoying. I mean all these detailed questions "Was Jesus able to sin?", "Would Jesus have sinned without the Holy Spirit?" it's so annoying because I don't know all the answers to those questions but they seem to be a big deal since christians argue about them and I also don't want to learn anything wrong. Should a christian be able to answer all these questions from the bible or is it possible that the bible is simply silent about some things?