Your questions on Indiana's RFRA answered.

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Bro. Curtis, Mar 30, 2015.

  1. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,242
    Likes Received:
    2
    Pull quote…

    "….Until now, the most controversial RFRA case was last year’s Hobby Lobby v. Burwell, which was about whether the federal government has a compelling interest in forcing religious business owners to pay for abortifacents. (It doesn’t.)

    This big gay freak-out is purely notional. No RFRA has ever been used successfully to defend anti-gay discrimination, not in twenty years of RFRAs nationwide.



    http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/30/your-questions-on-indianas-religious-freedom-bill-answered/
     
  2. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    10,988
    Likes Received:
    79
    George Stephanopoulos served under Clinton when the federal law was passed and he never said a word about Clinton.

    Indiana lawyer Eric Miller, a former candidate for Governor, said this:

     

    •Christian bakers, florists and photographers should not be punished for refusing to participate in a homosexual marriage!

    •A Christian business should not be punished for refusing to allow a man to use the women’s restroom!

    •A church should not be punished because they refuse to let the church be used for a homosexual wedding!

    http://www.advanceamerica.com/downloads.html
     

Share This Page

Loading...