Thinkingstuff
Active Member
This happened in the UK. And if the Dems get their way it will be business as usual here once the NHC Bill passes the Senate. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/beds/bucks/herts/8408794.stm
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
This happened in the UK. And if the Dems get their way it will be business as usual here once the NHC Bill passes the Senate. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/beds/bucks/herts/8408794.stm
Show us in the bill where a smiliary set up would be required in the US.
The problem is not the set up similarity with the English system but the implementation of a system that is entirely funded by the taxpayer through the auspices of the Bureaucratic system which often is more costly than the provision of the care itself. As the Tax base deminishes payment for provision reduces and you will end up with reduction in hospitals and staffing leading to overfilled maternity beds. We see it in every industry that a government has assumed responsibility for. I've been to English Hospitals and know first hand how they operate and I'm not impressed.
Along the same lines, I have used a hospital in the Czech Republic and talked with people there. It is a state run system and they seem to have none of the problems you speak of ... and the cost is much, much, less than here. My wife had to have her foot examined and x-rayed followed by a consultation with a doctor. The cost to us was less then $25.00 ... and she received excellent care.
So, it is not rational to point to England and say that a bill before Congress is dangerous to us because England is bad.