Obama's AG Holder--just can't say "Islam."

[rbell]

What an absolute piece of trash.

Here's an encounter for you, between Holder (terrorist sympathizer and racist--in charge of enforcing our laws (!)), and Rep. Lamar Smith of the Judiciary committee:

"In the case of all three attempts in the last year, the terrorist attempts, one of which was successful, those individuals have had ties to radical Islam," said Congressman Smith. "Do you feel that these individuals might have been incited to take the actions that they did because of radical Islam?"

"Because of ... ?"

"Radical Islam," repeated Smith.

"There are a variety of reasons why I think people have taken these actions," replied Eric Holder noncommittally. "I think you have to look at each individual case."

The congressman tried again. "Yes, but radical Islam could have been one of the reasons?"

"There are a variety of reasons why people ... ."

"But was radical Islam one of them?"

"There are a variety of reasons why people do things," the attorney general said again. "Some of them are potentially religious ... ."

Stuff happens. Hard to say why.

"Okay," said Smith. "But all I'm asking is if you think among those variety of reasons radical Islam might have been one of the reasons that the individuals took the steps that they did."

"You see, you say 'radical Islam,'" objected Holder. "I mean, I think those people who espouse a – a version of Islam that is not ... ."

"Are you uncomfortable attributing any actions to radical Islam?" asked Smith. "It sounds like it."

http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/-248862--.html#article-comments

If this guy stays AG for another term, we'll have to start posting in Arabic.

 

[rbell]

More from this imbecilic administration: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/17/obamas-invisible-islam/

Last year, the Department of Homeland Security Domestic Extremist Lexicon, which was pulled out of circulation in the wake of controversy with other department publications, listed Jewish extremism and various forms of Christian extremism as threats but made no mention of any form of Muslim extremism. The Feb. 1, 2010 Quadrennial Homeland Security Review discusses terrorism and violent extremism but does not mention radical Islam as a motivator, or in any context. The 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review likewise avoids any terminology related to Islam.

and:

Mr. Holder mentioned Anwar al-Awlaki, the U.S.-born radical cleric now holed up in Yemen who has been mentioned in connection with all three attacks. Mr. Holder said that Mr. al-Awlaki "has a version of Islam that is not consistent with the teachings of [the faith]." Mr. Holder did not go into details to back up his assertion that Mr. al-Awlaki, an Islamic scholar, is somehow at odds with his own faith, nor did he pinpoint exactly what Muslim teachings he was referring to.

The "force protection review" of the Fort Hood massacre omitted any mention of shooter Nidal Malik Hasan's openly radical Islamic worldview or the fact that he made the jihadist war cry "Allahu Akbar!" before opening fire. Initially, the Obama administration refused to even call the massacre an act of terrorism, much less radical Islamic terrorism.

I find the article's final sentence quite chilling, and possibly prophetic:

President Obama's continuing solicitude toward the faith of Muhammad is inexplicable, and as these acts of denial continue, it is becoming dangerous. The United States will not defeat an enemy it is afraid to identify.

 

[Martin]

What an absolute piece of trash.

==Trying to figure out how that does not violate Matthew 5:21-22, Romans 12:9-21, Titus 3:1-2, etc. It is one thing to strongly disagree with someone's positions, it is another thing to call them "an absolute piece of trash". In Scripture we are commanded "to malign no one...". Calling someone "an absolute piece of trash" seems to violate that. Let's not allow politics to cause us to sin by disobeying the Word of God.

Here's an encounter for you, between Holder (terrorist sympathizer and racist--in charge of enforcing our laws (!)), and Rep. Lamar Smith of the Judiciary committee:

==I don't know if AG Holder is a racist or not, again I try to avoid being guilty of maligning someone, but I certainly don't believe he is a "terrorist sympathizer". Do I agree with Holder's position? Certainly not. I believe he has, like many on the American left, fallen prey to an extreme form of political correctness. He is so afraid of offending someone that he will not call a duck a duck (mainly if he suspects that calling the duck a duck will offend the duck).

 

[billwald]

"Radical" is primarially defined as "basic" so Holder is radically correct.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/radical

rad·i·cal   [rad-i-kuhl] Show IPA
–adjective
1.
of or going to the root or origin; fundamental: a radical difference.
2.
thoroughgoing or extreme, esp. as regards change from accepted or traditional forms: a radical change in the policy of a company.
3.
favoring drastic political, economic, or social reforms: radical ideas; radical and anarchistic ideologues.
4.
forming a basis or foundation.
5.
existing inherently in a thing or person: radical defects of character.
6.
Mathematics.
a.
pertaining to or forming a root.
b.
denoting or pertaining to the radical sign.
c.
irrational (def. 5b).
7.
Grammar. of or pertaining to a root.
8.

 

[Cutter]

Here's an encounter for you, between Holder (terrorist sympathizer and racist--in charge of enforcing our laws (!)), and Rep. Lamar Smith of the Judiciary committee:


If this guy stays AG for another term, we'll have to start posting in Arabic.

Pathetic. The guy can't even bring himself to speak the truth. Sad too that there are so many defenders of this type of cowardice, even on the BB.

 

[ReformedBaptist]

Pathetic. The guy can't even bring himself to speak the truth. Sad too that there are so many defenders of this type of cowardice, even on the BB.

I agree Cutter. But what we can see is that these ungodly men are acting and speaking in their ungodly ways..namely, that they are either silent or defend the wicked, and condemn the just.

 

[FR7 Baptist]

I agree Cutter. But what we can see is that these ungodly men are acting and speaking in their ungodly ways..namely, that they are either silent or defend the wicked, and condemn the just.

How do you know Eric Holder is ungodly?

 

[rbell]

How do you know Eric Holder is ungodly?

Repeated lies, and refusal to uphold his oath of office, would be a start.

Not to mention his hatred of white folks.

 

[rbell]

Among Holder's long list of stupid, dangerous, and borderline treasonous actions:

• Trying to prosecute Bush's folks (opposed by seven former CIA directors).
• His butchering of the underwear bomber case (mirandizing the guy after 50 minutes was idiotic--and we're lucky we ended up with any intel from this goon).
• The desire to prosecute Khalid Sheik Muhammad in a civilian trial. IMO, if this goes through, and Americans are killed because of it, Holder should be tried for treason, and given the maximum penalty.
• Holder withheld info from Congress during his confirmation about his opposition to military trials for terrorists. This just might get his sorry tail fired (if we're lucky).
• Holder's referring to Americans as a "nation of cowards" because we don't agree with him on all matters racial (racist?).
• Holder's refusal to admit that Islam has a role in the latest domestic terror attack.
• Holder's refusal to admit that the recent Fort Hood shootings were Islamic-terror related (for cryin' out loud, the animal that was killing folks was shouting "Allahu Akbar!" as he did it...but Holder doesn't want that discussed).

We know the guy's incompetent. And racist. And from his coddling of Islamo-terrorists, I'm wondering if he's a sympathizer to their cause. What else would explain Holder's pathological behavior? He is a danger to our country.

 

[pinoybaptist]

shiboleth. ask him if he can say that word. lol.