Thinkingstuff
Active Member
Back to pretending not to understand the law again I see.
At this point I am tired or explaining and re-explaining and re-explaining why you are wrong.
After all the discussion on this - I can only conclude that you either choose not to understand or are purposely misrepresenting.
No. I haven't in fact. despite our previous look at the law the federal judge viewed it exactly as I suggested it could be looked at from a legal aspect. Which is why she made the decision she did. Now I have a laywer and a Judge who viewed the law as I've always said it could be interpreted. And Sheriff Joe also concures though he's in support of it.