Featured Specific threats to Christians about losing eternal life!

Ridicule without providing substance is the calling card of Satan and his servants.

 

I don't deny their existence at all. I deny your interpretation that they were the first English Baptists - that is rediculous and repudiated by the historical facts and testimony of English Baptists and their earliest historians (Crosby - vol. 2, Davis, etc.). John T. Christian provided volumes of repudiation of your theory.

 

You have just lied! I did not even address you or your post. I addressed the double :tongue3: of Thomas Hewly post. Even there, I only defined Satan's calling card without naming anyone. You are now guilty of lying.

 

You said "also" and that is your response to post #188 where I did not "ALSO" call Hewly a servant of Satan. Do you know the meaning of "also"?? It means IN ADDITION TO something and your telling a non-truth when you said that.

 

And what is accusing a brother? Oh, hold on, you don't consider me a brother: You just called me a follower and servant of Satan. You are a deceiver and liar, and you have just committed an offense that should subject you to being banned. You are nothing but a punk and a coward hiding behind your computer and throwing out falsehoods.

Let everyone see that I did not start this. I have tried not to respond to such things as you, Biblicist, have initiated. But you have thrown down the gauntlet too many times, and I have turned the other cheek. But Jesus didn't say what to do after that, so game on, punk.

 

My history in this matter comes from respected and reputable Baptist historians, not paedobaptists, nor fringe nutcases like J. Christian who promoted fables and myths and who have been completely discredited.

You have no more ground upon which to stand than Roman Catholics.

 

You simply ignore or twist the plain words of the text to uphold your untenable determinism.

You assassinate God's character, and then try to do that to your opponents. You are a liar and deceiver of the first class.

 

John T. Christian was a fringe nutcase, and you are the same.

 

This is what the coward punk does. I have read his old posts, and this is a common tactic of his, and then he denies doing it. He is a lying coward.

No RC, SDA, or Charismatic has ever called me what Biblicist has. If he is an example of "biblicism", I'd rather have the company of the three groups I mentioned.

 

Look at your own langauge! You are a complete hypocrit as out of your own mouth flows exactly what you are condemning in others.

I have never ridiculed others WITHOUT FIRST PROVIDING SUBSTANCE to support my position. Only when the other party IGNORES the substance and resorts to ridicule do they receive exactly what they mete out. You will never find a post of mine where I speak as you do above "coward punk...coward.."

Ridicule WITHOUT SUBSTANCE is the calling card of Satan and his servants.

 

You don't read very well do you! I gave a definition without applying it to anyone. It is generic in application. If the shoe fits wear it but stop lying by saying "you just called ME a follower and servant of Satan." THAT IS YOUR OWN APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE I gave. If that is true it came from your mouth not mine. Confession is good for the soul

 

You started it, you lying coward punk! Everybody knows you did. When I get called a heretic and a servant of Satan, you bet I won't take it! I'll PM you my real name and location, and let's see how brave you are.

 

Then confess, you liar.

 

Children, children, your Father in Heaven cannot be pleased with either of you.

First; should we use any form a ridicule with anyone, let alone towards a brother or sister in Christ?

Secondly; Jesus said do not repay evil for evil, so we cannot defend our sins by saying "you started it". Kinda reminds me of raising my kids years ago.

Thirdly: Ridiculing ONLY makes the one doing the ridiculing look bad, NEVER the one being ridiculed. So we really should abstain from all forms of it.

And fourthly; As far as who has the most learning goes; "And though I have [the gift of] prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing". (1Cor13) What does Paul, well actually the Holy Spirit speaking through Paul, think about you guy's little squabble going on here?

 

I agree, and that is why I am taking a sabbatical.

I do think there is a difference between initiating attacks and responding to them, even when the response is uncivil.

 

We are ever fighting back that flesh. We need each other to say real it back in now and again, :thumbs:

This darn sanctification process, be nice to skip it, :tongue3:

God speed brother!

 

John 6:36-40 deals specifically with the question whether a single solitary person who comes to Christ in faith will ever be lost and the answer is unequivocally "I SHALL LOSE NOTHING" and he is speaking about "OF ALL" the Father gave him - none failed to come to him in faith and none lost.

In direct contrast those who deny OSAS must directly contradict this conclusion by Christ. They must assert that at least ONE "OF ALL" the Father gave him which came to him became lost. They must assert that at least ONE "OF ALL" that came to Christ, became lost. However, Jesus denies that any that were given nor any that came were lost. That is a flat repudiation of Once Saved and then Lost theory.


Whenever a person chooses to pit scripture against scripture it is an admission that they are either in darkness about one or both as pitting scripture against scripture is never the correct response as it asserts that God is the author of confusion.

 

Well...

You DO honor experience above scripture, and most of the current Charasmatic chaos is from satan, so?