• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Google Now being forced to tale "anti isalamic' film off youtube!

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Any one remember free speech rights?

Would the Judge had forced them to pull an anti christian fim too?
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I am guessing that this is the Coptic film that Hillary and Obama blamed for causing Libya. Clearly the Democrats don't want that film around during the election since it was not only the source of their lies but also the reason for putting a Coptic Christian in prison on trumped up charges.
 
Apparently, an actress who appeared in the film sued because she was "lied to" about the film's content. She made the film!! How did she not know what it was about?? Sheer stupidity!
A US appeals court on Wednesday ordered YouTube to take down an anti-Islamic movie that triggered protests in the Muslim world, after an actress alleged she had been duped into appearing in it.

The 2012 appearance of "Innocence of Muslims" on Google's video-sharing site provoked deadly violence, but the current legal case against it relates only to the concerns of one of its stars.

US actress Cindy Lee Garcia brought a lawsuit claiming she was tricked into appearing in the film, without realizing its provocative anti-Muslim slant, and has received death threats as a result of it.
Can you say "liberal bias"? They're still crediting the attack on the consulate at Benghazi on this film! And I loved this one paragraph:
The amateurish movie, which depicted the Prophet Mohammed as a thuggish deviant, triggered a wave of violent protests that left dozens dead in September 2012.
Wake up call, world! Mohammed was a thuggish deviant. And "dozens dead"? We missed that somehow here in the U.S.? Unless they mean the dozens of terrorists our security forces killed before being overrun.

This story is disgusting!! I feel, now that I've read it, I should take a bath.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apparently, an actress who appeared in the film sued because she was "lied to" about the film's content. She made the film!! How did she not know what it was about?? Sheer stupidity!
Can you say "liberal bias"? They're still crediting the attack on the consulate at Benghazi on this film! And I loved this one paragraph:Wake up call, world! Mohammed was a thuggish deviant. And "dozens dead"? We missed that somehow here in the U.S.? Unless they mean the dozens of terrorists our security forces killed before being overrun.

This story is disgusting!! I feel, now that I've read it, I should take a bath.

Would the Judge order say the last Temptation of Chrsit to get yanked?
 
Would the Judge order say the last Temptation of Chrsit to get yanked?
That isn't even remotely the point, Yeshua. The point is, the woman lied. She couldn't help but know, from her dialogue and the setting of the scenes, what the film was about. This decision perpetuates the myths the White House and State have built up around the attacks on Benghazi, and it appears they are going to stand by those lies until the bitter end. I'm sure they enlisted the help of the actress and the judge to forward their story line.
 
Top