• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Sec Def: 9/11 Victims Bill “Devastating to US Military”

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"If" the drone strikes are taking out enemies then I find no fault with Obama. I question the idea that Obama is killing innocent people. Sorry, doesn't add up. The fact that terrorists will respond to the killing of their own people who are enemies is not surprising and in no way shows what Obama is doing to be in error.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
41 men targeted but 1,147 people killed: US drone strikes – the facts on the ground

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/24/-sp-us-drone-strikes-kill-1147


Obama-led drone strikes kill innocents 90% of the time: report

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/15/90-of-people-killed-by-us-drone-strikes-in-afghani/



Yea it will happen since the enemy hides in and among non combatants. Here is an idea....they non combatants shouldn't let them do that. Gee what a novel idea.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Yeah. it's not they're holding an AK 47 to their head or threatening their lives in any way or anything.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
No one is doing it on purpose when it does happen. Of course if one is completely a non interventionist first then trying to make hey out of every thing is common place. You still did not answer my question.

Yes I did.

Doesn't matter if it's done on purpose or not. Dead innocents are still dead innocents. Adding more dead innocent bodies to the pile isn't reducing the number of combatants it's increasing it.
 
Last edited:

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes I did.

Doesn't matter if it's done on purpose or not. Dead innocents are still dead innocents. Adding more dead innocents to the pile isn't reducing the number of combatants it's increasing it.

Only if the so called "innocents" are not sympathetic to them. And they are otherwise they would not let them be around them.

And no you did not answer my question. Still waiting
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Only if the so called "innocents" are not sympathetic to them. And they are otherwise they would not let them be around them.

And no you did not answer my question. Still waiting

You don't know who's sympathetic and who's not. You're speculating. I thought you were against speculation.

I'm no general but even I know you don't win a war by increasing the number of your enemies.

And yes I did answer your question. I just didn't answer it the way you think I should have answered it.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You don't know who's sympathetic and who's not. You're speculating. I thought you were against speculation.

I'm no general but even I know you don't win a war by increasing the number of your enemies.

Sure we do. If they are able to live in and among them then they are sympathetic. This is common place.

And yes I did answer your question. I just didn't answer it the way you think I should have answered it.

As I figured, can't answer it.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Sure we do. If they are able to live in and among them then they are sympathetic. This is common place.



As I figured, can't answer it.

That reasoning sounds an awful like "all Muslims are terrorists" to me. Aren't you one of those that have been saying this reasoning is wrong?

As I figured, you won't accept my answer.

Have you ever feared for your family's safety?
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That reasoning sounds an awful like "all Muslims are terrorists" to me. Aren't you one of those that have been saying this reasoning is wrong?

As I figured you won't accept my answer.

Have you ever feared for your family's safety?

I have and I eliminate the problem.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
I have and I eliminate the problem.

By moving out of the battle zone? By getting a gun? By telling terrorists to leave you're family alone?

I figured you wouldn't answer this question . . . . Aren't you one of those that have been saying this reasoning is wrong?
 
Top