• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Leaked Emails Reveal Clinton’s True Gun Control Intentions

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20161014/leaked-emails-reveal-clinton-s-true-gun-control-intentions



Leaked Emails Reveal Clinton’s True Gun Control Intentions


No matter the outcome of the 2016 U.S. Senate and House races, Hillary Clinton, if victorious, intends to attack your gun rights. Recently leaked emails of Clinton campaign staffers published by WikiLeaks show that the candidate plans to bypass Congress to enact gun control by executive order. Moreover, undercover video of U.S. Senate candidate Russ Feingold, released this week by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas, further exposed Clinton’s intent to impose new gun restrictions by executive fiat.

Snip

A leaked email that has received significant attention makes clear that Clinton believes “you need both a public and a private position” on a given policy. Other emails appear to show this strategy at work on gun control, as her aides expressed concern about the candidate publicly supporting New York’s ill-named SAFE Act.

On November 19, 2015, Clinton was presented with an award and spoke at a Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence gala in Manhattan. The event was also attended by N.Y. Governor Andrew Cuomo. In the run-up to the event, Clinton campaign research director Tony Carrk and policy advisor Corey Ciorciari discussed the extent to which Clinton should endorse the SAFE Act. Ciorciari emailed Carrk, “Don't see a need to fully embrace the SAFE Act. There are some controversial items in there.” Carrk concurred, responding, “I agree. SAFE is not a safe bet.”

Throughout her career Clinton has supported gun controls that exceed the SAFE Act’s onerous restrictions. Illustrating Clinton’s dual nature, while at the Brady event Clinton was careful to navigate around the controversial SAFE Act, but less than two months earlier Clinton contended that the Second Amendment does not protect an individual right to bear arms when she told the attendees of a private Manhattan fundraiser, “the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment…” In District of Columbia v. Heller the court ruled that the federal government could not restrict an individual from keeping an operable handgun in their home for self-defense.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
To take away the second amendment from we the sheeple can mean only one thing.

The sheep are going to be subject to more than just having a fleecing.

Don't ask.

HankD
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Pure foolishness and more GOP scare tactics. How is she gonna take away your guns:Cautious? Is she sending folks door to door to round them up?:rolleyes: Maybe she'll issue herself an executive warrant whereby they can just go in and take you guns? Or maybe folks with carry permits will start getting jumped on the street and their guns ripped from their holsters.

Yall are RIDICULOUSLY silly.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Pure foolishness and more GOP scare tactics. How is she gonna take away your guns:Cautious? Is she sending folks door to door to round them up?:rolleyes: Maybe she'll issue herself an executive warrant whereby they can just go in and take you guns? Or maybe folks with carry permits will start getting jumped on the street and their guns ripped from their holsters.

Yall are RIDICULOUSLY silly.
We shall see and thanks for the heads up.

HankD
 
Top