• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

More Winning

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"In San Francisco, where 23 percent of residents struggle with hunger"...

In one of the richest cities in the country. Hmmmm...:Notworthy

Liberals...:rolleyes:
 

HawgWyld

Member
"In San Francisco, where 23 percent of residents struggle with hunger"...

In one of the richest cities in the country. Hmmmm...:Notworthy

Liberals...:rolleyes:

Well, the important ones have plenty of money. Apparently, it's the government's job to throw a few crumbs to those in need...
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Matthew 25:42 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
From the article:
A household can qualify even if some members are not legal residents.

Families that qualify for CalFresh benefits because the children are citizens when the parents are not, for example, may choose not to participate for fear that their personal information will be released to the federal government. But the city of San Francisco, which administers benefits within the county, said information about household members who do not apply is not released to the federal government, which also doesn’t access its CalFresh systems for immigration enforcement action.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
First thing is break up those [Edited: Profane language] sanctuary cities. San Fran is one of the biggest but almost any city is also.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
Oops. I thought the thread was about Trump. I thought it was about "more whining."
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

"The city is concerned by a recent spike of withdrawals from CalFresh, or food stamps, among eligible households with at least one noncitizen." Home

Seriously? It is well known, (or should be), Governments (ie in this case, SF) receive $$$, FOR effectively soliciting people to become government dependents.

Seriously? THAT in itself, is NEVER challenged, questioned or seemingly something to take issue with?

Seriously? The "government" PREACHES Liberty /Independence.... out of one side of their mouth, WHILE "promoting" AND "soliciting" Dependence......WHICH IS NOT LIBERTY!

Master / Slave relationships still exist.....with a different twist.....to become a slave voluntarily! ugh!

LEGAL MASTER / SERVANT RELATIONSHIP

The master typically has total authority over the servant in directing the manner, place, and time of services in this type of relationship.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yeah, hard to believe that if a local government gets federal money that they would actually publicize the fact and want citizens to partake in it. Shocking!

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yeah, hard to believe that if a local government gets federal money that they would actually publicize the fact and want citizens to partake in it. Shocking!

Actually you have it backwards.

Lower governments are offered to be given $$, IF they project a successful "solicitation" program.

They are given $$ based on the lower government PROJECTION.

IF, the lower government, meets "their" projection, the $$ given them is "justified".

IF, the lower government, DOES NOT MEET "their" projection; then, on the next go round, (ie the time frame designated for them to solicited the higher government for $$), the lower government will not receive as much $$.

What you seem to be oblivious to.....IS......while the lower government is the recipient of the $$ "FOR" a specific "program".....the lower government receives ADDITIONAL $$ outside of the "program" needs...
$$ the lower government can SPEND according to their choice.

And AIN'T that dandy? The higher government COMPELS / FORCES citizens OUTSIDE of the jurisdiction of SF, to financially support the government of SF, via taxation and shuffling of such collected tax dollars!
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Actually you have it backwards.

Lower governments are offered to be given $$, IF they project a successful "solicitation" program.

They are given $$ based on the lower government PROJECTION.

IF, the lower government, meets "their" projection, the $$ given them is "justified".

IF, the lower government, DOES NOT MEET "their" projection; then, on the next go round, (ie the time frame designated for them to solicited the higher government for $$), the lower government will not receive as much $$.

Prove it.


Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Prove it.


Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.

Don't have to. Programs and How they are implemented are revealed in the Law, the Regulations and the reports complied into a booklet that is given to Reps, and available to the public, IF the public is so inclined to READ the LAWS, READ the REGULATIONS and READ Congressional reports, which I do.

If that is not YOUR inclination, so what? Not my job to go read it for you.
 
Last edited:

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yeah, hard to believe that if a local government gets federal money that they would actually publicize the fact and want citizens to partake in it. Shocking!

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.

Not hard to believe you do not comprehend the difference between public law, available to everyone, and solicitation.

Guess it kind of bypassed your comprehension; Not only are citizens COMPELLED to financially support, citizens AND illegal aliens via food programs.....ADDITIONALLY citizens are COMPELLED to financially support whims a lower government decides they want to effect IN THEIR JURISDICTION, (benefit of people compelled to financially support their whims....? uh no.) AND additionally citizens are COMPELLED, to financially support the very people who are out "recruiting", by "solicitation" other citizens and illegal aliens to come take ADVANTAGE of the government's "theft" of one citizen, to give to another person (citizen or not), under color of law.

IF that were truly lawful ~ funny how the very statesmen who established this country and it's premise for a LAWFUL law.... forgot to implement the same nonsense of thieving from one to give to another.
 
Top