Tucker Carlson: Biden Selling U.S. Emergency Oil Reserves to China is Impeachable–Possibly Indictable Offense › American Greatness
Our reserves are now at the lowest level since 1986.
Our reserves are now at the lowest level since 1986.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Biden drains oil reserves to sell to China & his other friends, it’s not for us/U.S.
- Thread starter Wingman68
- Start date
5 point Gillinist
Active Member
What are the odds that nothing will happen to him, and all the morons who are enraged at the Jan 6 protesters won't care about an actual treasonous act?
Jan 6 hearing is cover for the continued treason of the Democratic party.
Hang by neck till dead and firing squad are the best two.
Not saying I support his actions or that they are wise, but do they meet the Constitutional definition of treason? His actions may be many things but are they treasonous as the Constitution defines the crime?
Foolish, short-sighted, inept, unwise, inane, ignorant…
… but not treasonous.
This country appears to be directed by kids that majored in Public Relations and Women’s Studies.
If his goal is to save the “World”
1) greatly lower the use of fossil fuel… hence price increase is good
2) lower human population… therefore abortion is good
3) make people more dependent on the government … therefore increasing the uneducated population and more illegal immigrants
He thinks he’s doing a grand job…
Rob
… but not treasonous.
This country appears to be directed by kids that majored in Public Relations and Women’s Studies.
If his goal is to save the “World”
1) greatly lower the use of fossil fuel… hence price increase is good
2) lower human population… therefore abortion is good
3) make people more dependent on the government … therefore increasing the uneducated population and more illegal immigrants
He thinks he’s doing a grand job…
Rob
Last edited:
The OP did not mention treason, however the definition of treason according to law could be argued under U.S.Code:
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than 10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than 10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Problem is it's not actually treason. This falls into the category of Clinton's trade deal with China. Bad idea. Not treason.
Letting them have our nuclear, what was it W-80 war heads? To long ago to remember exactly
That's the American way, unfortunately. We made Al-Qaeda when we wanted them to fight the Soviets. We were essential to Castro's rise to power (and his move to communism).
Unfortunately we often make our own beds. But that's politics, isn't it.
Take a look at Article III, Sec. 3
Last edited:
This past April, the Biden admin sold 950,000 Strategic Petroleum Reserve barrels to a Chinese gas company that a private equity firm co-founded by HUNTER BIDEN owns a $1.7 billion stake in. #BidenCrimeFamily.
They are. Jeopardizing our national security while aiding an enemy is treason.
atpollard
Well-Known Member
I believe that China still has Most Favored Nation trade status … making any argument that they are our “enemy” legally problematic. Just say no to the Kool-Aid and yes to rational arguments.
Bad trade deals are foolish.
Trade deals that financially benefit relatives of politicians making those deals may be “criminal”.
It is not “Treason” as defined in the Constitution (specifically to prevent the abuse of calling anything you don’t like “Treason”.)
5 point Gillinist
Active Member
Treason in the sense that it is only one more incident in the long line of other acts that has brought down the nation. Whether or not one considers intentionally destroying the nation an act of treason as opposed to trespassing I will leave to the judgement of the individual
Last edited:
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
I believe he has broken his oath taken January 20, 2021 and has levied war against that very oath and the citizens of these United States of America!
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
I believe he has broken his oath taken January 20, 2021 and has levied war against that very oath and the citizens of these United States of America!
On Thursday’s broadcast of the Fox Business Network’s “Mornings with Maria,” Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) reacted to reports that some of the oil released from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve was exported to other countries, including China, by stating that the reserve is for emergencies, “not the personal energy slush fund of the president.” And now Biden has “drained it three times to try to get himself out of the crisis that his own policies have created. Now, that’s creating a new danger for us.”
Johnson stated, “No one can explain it. That headline is just — should make every American irate. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve, of course, is there to protect our country in the event of an unforeseeable event, like a terrorist attack, natural disaster, etc. It is not the personal energy slush fund of the president. And yet he’s done it now — he’s used it three times, drained it three times to try to get himself out of the crisis that his own policies have created. Now, that’s creating a new danger for us. Because now the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is drained. … So, he’s adding more peril to the American people and more pain at the pump. It’s ridiculous.”
Johnson stated, “No one can explain it. That headline is just — should make every American irate. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve, of course, is there to protect our country in the event of an unforeseeable event, like a terrorist attack, natural disaster, etc. It is not the personal energy slush fund of the president. And yet he’s done it now — he’s used it three times, drained it three times to try to get himself out of the crisis that his own policies have created. Now, that’s creating a new danger for us. Because now the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is drained. … So, he’s adding more peril to the American people and more pain at the pump. It’s ridiculous.”
5 point Gillinist
Active Member
It's almost like there is a plan to have some sort of disaster event, and therefore have a greater disaster by not having sufficient oil? Better stock up now on whatever it is you use frequently, I wouldn't be surprised if we have a major crisis within the next few months (or less).
He doesn’t think Rob… he does as he is told. Thinking assumes he has the mental capacity to reason and that requires brain cells and synapses a snapping… a process I believe has long since quit on the guy, rendering Brandan an inert pawn to those currently in control.